Curtis Jeffrey R, Sarsour Khaled, Napalkov Pavel, Costa Laurie A, Schulman Kathy L
Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, UAB Arthritis Clinical Intervention Program, University of Alabama at Birmingham, FOT 802D, 510 20th Street South, Birmingham, AL, 35924, USA.
Genentech, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.
Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 Nov 11;17:319. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0835-7.
Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common extra-articular condition in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but few studies have systematically investigated its incidence and risk factors in patients receiving anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNFα) agents or alternate mechanisms of action (MOAs) (e.g., T-cell, B-cell, and interleukin-6 inhibitors).
RA patients at least 18 years old were selected from the MarketScan databases (2010-2012) if they had at least one prescription/administration of abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, or anti-TNF after having discontinued a different biologic agent and meeting enrollment criteria. Cox models estimated the risk of incident ILD and ILD-related hospitalization. Sensitivity analyses used an alternate ILD case definition.
We identified 13,795 episodes of biologic exposure in 11,219 patients. Mean (standard deviation) follow-up was 0.7 (0.5) years. Patients receiving alternate MOA agents were more likely to have had recent exposure to steroids, prior exposure to a greater number of biologics, and history of ILD, anemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and other pulmonary conditions. When the sensitive definition was used, unadjusted ILD incidence rates (95% confidence interval, or CI) ranged from 4.0 (1.6-8.2, abatacept) to 12.2 (5.6-23.2, infliximab) per 1000 person-years. Being older (hazard ratio (HR) 3.5; 95% CI 2.1-6.0), being male (HR 3.1; 95% CI 1.2-8.4), and having another pulmonary condition (HR 4.8; 95% CI 1.7-13.7) were associated with increased ILD incidence in either sensitive and/or specific models. There were no significant differences by biologic class. Hospitalization rates (95% CI) when the sensitive definition was used ranged from 55.6 (6.7-200.7, tocilizumab) to 262.5 (71.5-672.2, infliximab). In Cox models, recent methotrexate exposure was associated with reduced ILD hospitalization (HR 0.16; 95% CI 0.06-0.46), whereas being male (HR 2.5; 95% CI 1.3-4.8) and having had a hospitalization for asthma (HR 3.4; 95% CI 1.2-9.8) or ILD/pneumonia (HR 2.3; 95% CI 1.1-4.7) in the 12 months prior to index were associated with increased hospitalization risk.
There were no significant differences in the risk of ILD and its related complications between RA patients receiving anti-TNFα agents and those receiving alternate MOA agents. Further studies are needed that account for differences in baseline characteristics in order to fully evaluate the risk of ILD and its complications.
间质性肺病(ILD)是类风湿关节炎(RA)常见的关节外表现,但很少有研究系统地调查接受抗肿瘤坏死因子-α(抗TNFα)药物或其他作用机制(MOA)(如T细胞、B细胞和白细胞介素-6抑制剂)的患者中ILD的发病率及其危险因素。
从MarketScan数据库(2010 - 2012年)中选取至少18岁的RA患者,这些患者在停用一种不同的生物制剂后,至少有一次阿巴西普、利妥昔单抗、托珠单抗或抗TNF的处方/用药记录,并符合纳入标准。Cox模型估计发生ILD及与ILD相关住院的风险。敏感性分析采用另一种ILD病例定义。
我们在11219例患者中识别出13795次生物制剂暴露事件。平均(标准差)随访时间为0.7(0.5)年。接受其他MOA药物的患者更可能近期使用过类固醇、既往接触过更多种类的生物制剂,且有ILD、贫血、慢性阻塞性肺疾病及其他肺部疾病史。采用敏感性定义时,未调整的ILD发病率(95%置信区间,CI)每1000人年为4.0(1.6 - 8.2,阿巴西普)至12.2(5.6 - 23.2,英夫利昔单抗)。年龄较大(风险比(HR)3.5;95% CI 2.1 - 6.0)、男性(HR 3.1;95% CI 1.2 - 8.4)以及患有其他肺部疾病(HR 4.8;95% CI 1.7 - 13.7)在敏感性和/或特异性模型中均与ILD发病率增加相关。不同生物制剂类别之间无显著差异。采用敏感性定义时,住院率(95% CI)为55.6(6.7 - 200.7,托珠单抗)至262.5(71.5 - 672.2,英夫利昔单抗)。在Cox模型中,近期使用甲氨蝶呤与ILD住院风险降低相关(HR 0.16;95% CI 0.06 - 0.46),而男性(HR 2.5;95% CI 1.3 - 4.8)以及在索引日期前12个月因哮喘住院(HR 3.4;95% CI 1.2 - 9.8)或因ILD/肺炎住院(HR 2.3;95% CI 1.1 - 4.7)与住院风险增加相关。
接受抗TNFα药物的RA患者与接受其他MOA药物的患者在ILD及其相关并发症风险方面无显著差异。需要进一步研究以考虑基线特征差异,从而全面评估ILD及其并发症的风险。