Rud B, Vestergaard A, Hyldstrup L
Abdominal Center K, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Radiology, Hvidovre University Hospital, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Apr;27(4):1451-1458. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3395-4. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
Six dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) technicians reviewed lateral images of the spine for deformed vertebrae. The images were acquired with a DXA scanner in 235 patients referred for osteoporosis assessment. The outcome was compared to findings on spinal radiographs assessed by two radiologists. Three DXA technicians performed acceptable or better in identifying patients with fractured vertebrae.
This is the first study to evaluate the accuracy of vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) when used by DXA technicians as a triage test to select patients with deformed vertebrae for spinal radiographs.
Lateral single-energy scans and radiographs of the thoracolumbar spine (T4-L4) were acquired in 235 patients aged 65 years or more referred for osteoporosis assessment. Six DXA technicians evaluated lateral scans using dedicated software. The DXA technicians were trained to identify deformed vertebrae, but they did not assess the aetiology of deformity. Two radiologists evaluated the radiographs and their consensus evaluation served as the reference test for vertebral fracture. The main outcome was sensitivity and specificity of the DXA technicians' identification of patients with one or more grade II-III deformities according to Genant's classification.
The proportion of patients with one or more grade II-III vertebral fractures was 0.35. Sensitivity ranged from 0.61 to 0.83 and specificity ranged from 0.78 to 0.95 across the DXA technicians. In patients with grade II-III deformities on VFA, the mean probability of one or more grade II-III fractures was 0.74 (range 0.66-0.86). Conversely, in patients without such deformities, the mean probability of grade II-III fractures was 0.14 (range 0.10-0.18). Accuracy was lower for grade I-III deformities for all the DXA technicians.
Three of six DXA technicians achieved acceptable or better accuracy when using VFA to triage patients with grade II-III vertebral deformities for spinal radiographs. Heterogeneity between DXA technicians appears to be due to differences in subjective thresholds. VFA triage by DXA technicians to identify patients with grade II-III fractures is feasible.
六名双能X线吸收测定法(DXA)技术人员对脊柱的侧位图像进行了检查,以查找变形椎体。这些图像是通过DXA扫描仪为235名因骨质疏松评估而转诊的患者采集的。将结果与两名放射科医生评估的脊柱X光片结果进行比较。三名DXA技术人员在识别椎体骨折患者方面表现良好或更佳。
这是第一项评估DXA技术人员将椎体骨折评估(VFA)用作分诊测试以选择脊柱X光片检查的变形椎体患者时的准确性的研究。
对235名年龄65岁及以上因骨质疏松评估而转诊的患者进行了胸腰椎(T4-L4)的侧位单能扫描和X光片检查。六名DXA技术人员使用专用软件评估侧位扫描。DXA技术人员接受了识别变形椎体的培训,但他们没有评估畸形的病因。两名放射科医生评估了X光片,他们的共识评估用作椎体骨折的参考测试。主要结果是DXA技术人员根据Genant分类法识别有一处或多处II-III级畸形患者的敏感性和特异性。
有一处或多处II-III级椎体骨折的患者比例为0.35。在所有DXA技术人员中,敏感性范围为0.61至0.83,特异性范围为0.78至0.95。在VFA显示有II-III级畸形的患者中,一处或多处II-III级骨折的平均概率为0.74(范围为0.66-0.86)。相反,在没有此类畸形的患者中,II-III级骨折的平均概率为0.14(范围为0.10-0.18)。所有DXA技术人员对I-III级畸形的准确性较低。
六名DXA技术人员中有三名在使用VFA对II-III级椎体畸形患者进行脊柱X光片分诊时达到了可接受或更好的准确性。DXA技术人员之间的异质性似乎是由于主观阈值的差异。DXA技术人员通过VFA分诊来识别II-III级骨折患者是可行的。