Musculoskeletal Unit, Galgo Medical, Barcelona, Spain.
BCN Medtech, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
Osteoporos Int. 2019 May;30(5):1099-1110. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-04894-y. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
A retrospective case-control study assessing the association of DXA-derived 3D measurements with osteoporosis-related vertebral fractures was performed. Trabecular volumetric bone mineral density was the measurement that best discriminates between fracture and control groups.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association of DXA-derived 3D measurements at the lumbar spine with osteoporosis-related vertebral fractures.
We retrospectively analyzed a database of 74 postmenopausal women: 37 subjects with incident vertebral fractures and 37 age-matched controls without any type of fracture. DXA scans at the lumbar spine were acquired at baseline (i.e., before the fracture event for subjects in the fracture group), and areal bone mineral density (aBMD) was measured. DXA-derived 3D measurements, such as volumetric BMD (vBMD), were assessed using a DXA-based 3D modeling software (3D-SHAPER). vBMD was computed at the trabecular, cortical, and integral bone. Cortical thickness and cortical surface BMD were also measured. Differences in DXA-derived measurements between fracture and control groups were evaluated using unpaired t test. Odds ratio (OR) and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) were also computed. Subgroup analyses according to fractured vertebra were performed.
aBMD of fracture group was 9.3% lower compared with control group (p < 0.01); a higher difference was found for trabecular vBMD in the vertebral body (- 16.1%, p < 0.001). Trabecular vBMD was the measurement that best discriminates between fracture and control groups, with an AUC of 0.733, against 0.682 for aBMD. Overall, similar findings were observed within the subgroup analyses. The L1 vertebral fractures subgroup had the highest AUC at trabecular vBMD (0.827), against aBMD (0.758).
This study showed the ability of cortical and trabecular measurements from DXA-derived 3D models to discriminate between fracture and control groups. Large cohorts need to be analyzed to determine if these measurements could improve fracture risk prediction in clinical practice.
本研究旨在评估 DXA 衍生的 3D 测量值与骨质疏松性椎体骨折之间的相关性。
我们回顾性分析了一个由 74 名绝经后女性组成的数据库:37 名发生椎体骨折的受试者和 37 名年龄匹配的无任何类型骨折的对照组。基线时(即对于骨折组中的受试者,在骨折事件之前)采集腰椎 DXA 扫描,并测量面积骨密度(aBMD)。使用基于 DXA 的 3D 建模软件(3D-SHAPER)评估 DXA 衍生的 3D 测量值,如体积 BMD(vBMD)。vBMD 是在骨小梁、皮质和整体骨中计算的。还测量了皮质厚度和皮质表面 BMD。使用未配对 t 检验评估骨折组和对照组之间 DXA 衍生测量值的差异。还计算了比值比(OR)和接收器操作特征曲线(AUC)下的面积。根据骨折椎体进行了亚组分析。
与对照组相比,骨折组的 aBMD 低 9.3%(p<0.01);在椎体中,骨小梁 vBMD 的差异更大(-16.1%,p<0.001)。骨小梁 vBMD 是区分骨折组和对照组的最佳测量值,AUC 为 0.733,而 aBMD 的 AUC 为 0.682。总体而言,在亚组分析中观察到了类似的结果。在骨小梁 vBMD 方面,L1 椎体骨折亚组的 AUC 最高(0.827),而 aBMD 的 AUC 为 0.758。
本研究表明,DXA 衍生的 3D 模型的皮质和小梁测量值能够区分骨折组和对照组。需要分析更大的队列以确定这些测量值是否可以提高临床实践中的骨折风险预测。