Suppr超能文献

青少年非致命性暴力伤害审查小组:一种为政策和系统变革提供信息的创新模式。

The Youth Nonfatal Violent Injury Review Panel: An Innovative Model to Inform Policy and Systems Change.

作者信息

Purtle Jonathan, Rich Linda J, Rich John A, Cooper Jazzmin, Harris Erica J, Corbin Theodore J

机构信息

Drexel University School of Public Health, Department of Health Management and Policy, Philadelphia, PA.

Drexel University College of Medicine, Center for Nonviolence and Social Justice, Philadelphia, PA.

出版信息

Public Health Rep. 2015 Nov-Dec;130(6):610-5. doi: 10.1177/003335491513000610.

Abstract

Among young people in the United States, nonfatal violent injuries outnumber fatal violent injuries by 171 to 1. The Child Fatality Review Team (CFRT) is a well-established model for informing injury prevention planning. The CFRT's restricted focus on fatal injuries, however, limits its ability to identify opportunities to prevent violent reinjury and address issues unique to nonfatal violent injuries. We adapted the CFRT model to develop and implement a Youth Nonfatal Violent Injury Review Panel. We convened representatives from 23 agencies (e.g., police, housing, and education) quarterly to share administrative information and confidentially discuss cases of nonfatal violent injury. In this article, we describe the panel model and present preliminary data on participants' perceptions of the process. Although outcomes research is needed to evaluate its impacts, the Youth Nonfatal Violent Injury Review Panel offers an innovative, promising, and replicable model for interagency collaboration to prevent youth violence and its effects.

摘要

在美国年轻人中,非致命性暴力伤害与致命性暴力伤害的数量之比为171比1。儿童死亡审查小组(CFRT)是一个成熟的为伤害预防规划提供信息的模式。然而,CFRT对致命伤害的有限关注限制了其识别预防暴力再伤害机会以及解决非致命性暴力伤害特有问题的能力。我们对CFRT模式进行了调整,以建立并实施一个青少年非致命性暴力伤害审查小组。我们每季度召集来自23个机构(如警察、住房和教育部门)的代表,分享行政信息并秘密讨论非致命性暴力伤害案件。在本文中,我们描述了该小组模式,并展示了参与者对该过程看法的初步数据。尽管需要进行结果研究来评估其影响,但青少年非致命性暴力伤害审查小组为跨机构合作预防青少年暴力及其影响提供了一个创新、有前景且可复制的模式。

相似文献

1
The Youth Nonfatal Violent Injury Review Panel: An Innovative Model to Inform Policy and Systems Change.
Public Health Rep. 2015 Nov-Dec;130(6):610-5. doi: 10.1177/003335491513000610.
3
Critical Violent Injury in the United States: A Review and Call to Action.
Crit Care Med. 2015 Nov;43(11):2460-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001255.
4
Before and after the trauma bay: the prevention of violent injury among youth.
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Apr;53(4):490-500. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.11.014. Epub 2009 Jan 22.

本文引用的文献

1
The psychological sequelae of violent injury in a pediatric intervention.
J Pediatr Surg. 2014 Nov;49(11):1668-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.08.007. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
2
Boston Violence Intervention Advocacy Program: a qualitative study of client experiences and perceived effect.
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Jul;21(7):742-51. doi: 10.1111/acem.12409. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
3
Posttraumatic stress following pediatric injury: update on diagnosis, risk factors, and intervention.
JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Dec;167(12):1158-65. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.2741.
4
Child maltreatment deaths in the U.S. National Child Death Review Case Reporting System.
Child Abuse Negl. 2014 Jan;38(1):25-36. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.08.014. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
6
Violent and fatal youth trauma: is there a missed opportunity?
West J Emerg Med. 2012 May;13(2):146-50. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2011.6.6765.
7
Collaborative process improvement to enhance injury prevention in child death review.
Inj Prev. 2011 Feb;17 Suppl 1:i71-6. doi: 10.1136/ip.2010.027334.
10
Injury prevention in child death review.
Inj Prev. 2011 Feb;17 Suppl 1:i1-3. doi: 10.1136/ip.2010.031161.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验