Statistical superiority sometimes makes little clinical sense.
作者信息
Olsson Carl A, Lattimer John K
机构信息
Columbia University Medical Center, Integrated Medical Professionals, 3111 New Hyde Park Road, North Hills, NY 11042, United States.
出版信息
Arab J Urol. 2013 Dec;11(4):360-1. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2013.10.002. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Statistical superiority sometimes makes little clinical sense.统计学上的优越性有时没什么临床意义。
Arab J Urol. 2013 Dec;11(4):360-1. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2013.10.002. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
2
Specific statistical considerations relevant to the design and analysis of gingivitis trials demonstrating product superiority or equivalence.与证明产品优越性或等效性的牙龈炎试验的设计和分析相关的特定统计学考量。
J Periodontal Res. 1992 Jul;27(4 Pt 2):378-89; discussion 390-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1992.tb01701.x.
3
Evaluating "superiority", "equivalence" and "non-inferiority" in clinical trials.评估临床试验中的“优效性”、“等效性”和“非劣效性”。
Ann Saudi Med. 2007 Jul-Aug;27(4):284-8. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2007.284.
4
Re: Madsen et al. "Unnecessary work tasks and mental health: a prospective analysis of Danish human service workers".关于：马德森等人所著的《不必要的工作任务与心理健康：丹麦人类服务工作者的前瞻性分析》
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2015 Mar;41(2):216-7. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3473. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
5
Non-inferiority versus superiority drug claims: the (not so) subtle distinction.非劣效性与优效性药物声明：（并非那么）细微的区别。
Trials. 2017 Jun 15;18(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2024-2.
6
An audit of the statistical validity of conclusions of clinical superiority in anaesthesia journals.对麻醉学杂志中临床优越性结论的统计有效性进行的一项审计。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2014 Sep;42(5):599-607. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1404200509.
7
A hybrid Bayesian-frequentist approach to evaluate clinical trial designs for tests of superiority and non-inferiority.一种用于评估优效性和非劣效性试验的临床试验设计的贝叶斯-频率主义混合方法。
Stat Med. 2008 Feb 20;27(4):504-19. doi: 10.1002/sim.3028.
8
Testing superiority and non-inferiority hypotheses in active controlled clinical trials.在活性对照临床试验中检验优效性和非劣效性假设。
Biom J. 2005 Feb;47(1):62-74; discussion 99-107. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200410089.
9
RNA editing. Sometimes an editor makes sense.
Nature. 1990 Feb 22;343(6260):697-9. doi: 10.1038/343697a0.
10
Modified Haybittle-Peto group sequential designs for testing superiority and non-inferiority hypotheses in clinical trials.用于在临床试验中检验优效性和非劣效性假设的改良Haybittle-Peto成组序贯设计。
Stat Med. 2006 Apr 15;25(7):1149-67. doi: 10.1002/sim.2357.
本文引用的文献
1
The role of an abnormal prostate-specific antigen level and an abnormal digital rectal examination in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: A cross-sectional study in Qatar.前列腺特异性抗原水平异常和直肠指检异常在前列腺癌诊断中的作用：卡塔尔的一项横断面研究。
Arab J Urol. 2013 Dec;11(4):355-60. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2013.08.014. Epub 2013 Oct 20.
Zotero 插件