• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮螺钉固定骶髂关节新月形骨折脱位

Percutaneous Screw Fixation of Crescent Fracture-Dislocation of the Sacroiliac Joint.

作者信息

Shui Xiaolong, Ying Xiaozhou, Mao Chuanwan, Feng Yongzeng, Chen Linwei, Kong Jianzhong, Guo Xiaoshan, Wang Gang

出版信息

Orthopedics. 2015 Nov;38(11):e976-82. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20151020-05.

DOI:10.3928/01477447-20151020-05
PMID:26558677
Abstract

Crescent fracture-dislocation of the sacroiliac joint (CFDSIJ) is a type of lateral compression pelvic injury associated with instability. Open reduction and internal fixation is a traditional treatment of CFDSIJ. However, a minimally invasive method has never been reported. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcome of closed reduction and percutaneous fixation for different types of CFDSIJ and present their clinical outcome. The authors reviewed 117 patients diagnosed with CFDSIJ between July 2003 and July 2013. Closed reduction and percutaneous fixation was performed in 73 patients. Treatment selection was based on Day's fracture classification. For type I fractures, fixation perpendicular to the fracture line were performed. For type II fractures, crossed fixation was performed. For type III fractures, fixation was performed with iliosacral screws. Forty-four patients were treated by open reduction and plate fixation. Demographics, fracture pattern distribution, blood loss, incision lengths, revision surgeries, radiological results, and functional scores were compared. All 117 patients were followed for more than 6 months (mean, 14 months [range, 6-24 months]). Blood loss, extensive exposure, duration of posterior ring surgery, duration of hospital stay, and infection rates were lower in the closed group (P<.01). Patients in the closed group achieved better functional performance (P<.01). There were no significant differences in reduction quality (P=.32), revision surgery rates (P=.27), and iatrogenic neurologic injuries (P=.2) between the 2 groups. The authors' results indicate that closed reduction and percutaneous fixation is a safe and effective surgical method for CFDSIJ.

摘要

骶髂关节新月形骨折脱位(CFDSIJ)是一种与不稳定相关的侧方压缩性骨盆损伤。切开复位内固定是CFDSIJ的传统治疗方法。然而,微创方法从未被报道过。本研究的目的是评估不同类型CFDSIJ的闭合复位经皮固定的结果并展示其临床疗效。作者回顾了2003年7月至2013年7月期间诊断为CFDSIJ的117例患者。73例患者接受了闭合复位经皮固定。治疗选择基于戴氏骨折分类。对于I型骨折,垂直于骨折线进行固定。对于II型骨折,进行交叉固定。对于III型骨折,使用髂骶螺钉进行固定。44例患者接受了切开复位钢板固定。比较了人口统计学、骨折类型分布、失血量、切口长度、翻修手术、影像学结果和功能评分。所有117例患者均随访超过6个月(平均14个月[范围6 - 24个月])。闭合组的失血量、广泛暴露、后环手术时间、住院时间和感染率较低(P <.01)。闭合组患者的功能表现更好(P <.01)。两组之间在复位质量(P =.32)、翻修手术率(P =.27)和医源性神经损伤(P =.2)方面无显著差异。作者的结果表明,闭合复位经皮固定是治疗CFDSIJ的一种安全有效的手术方法。

相似文献

1
Percutaneous Screw Fixation of Crescent Fracture-Dislocation of the Sacroiliac Joint.经皮螺钉固定骶髂关节新月形骨折脱位
Orthopedics. 2015 Nov;38(11):e976-82. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20151020-05.
2
Posterior iliac crescent fracture-dislocation: what morphological variations are amenable to iliosacral screw fixation?髂后窝新月形骨折-脱位:哪些形态变异适合进行骶髂螺钉固定?
Injury. 2013 Feb;44(2):194-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.10.028. Epub 2012 Nov 24.
3
Vertically unstable pelvic fractures fixed with percutaneous iliosacral screws: does posterior injury pattern predict fixation failure?经皮骶髂螺钉固定垂直不稳定骨盆骨折:后方损伤模式能否预测固定失败?
J Orthop Trauma. 2006 Jan;20(1 Suppl):S30-6; discussion S36.
4
[Classification and Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Dislocation].[骶髂关节脱位的分类与治疗]
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2017 Sep;48(5):661-667.
5
Closed reduction with CT-guided screw fixation for unstable sacroiliac joint fracture-dislocation.CT引导下闭合复位螺钉固定治疗不稳定型骶髂关节骨折脱位
Pediatr Radiol. 2004 Dec;34(12):963-9. doi: 10.1007/s00247-004-1291-8. Epub 2004 Sep 9.
6
Intra-operative multi-dimensional fluoroscopy of guidepin placement prior to iliosacral screw fixation for posterior pelvic ring injuries and sacroiliac dislocation: an early case series.用于骨盆后环损伤和骶髂关节脱位的骶髂螺钉固定术前导针置入的术中多维透视:早期病例系列
Int Orthop. 2017 Oct;41(10):2171-2177. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3447-9. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
7
Do Transsacral-transiliac Screws Across Uninjured Sacroiliac Joints Affect Pain and Functional Outcomes in Trauma Patients?经骶骨-髂骨螺钉穿过未受伤的骶髂关节对创伤患者的疼痛和功能结局有影响吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jun;474(6):1417-21. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4596-z.
8
[Minimally invasive internal fixation of pelvic ring for type C pelvic fracture].[C型骨盆骨折的微创骨盆环内固定术]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2017 Jul 25;30(7):660-663. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2017.07.016.
9
Comparison of percutaneous cross screw fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation for pelvic Day type II crescent fracture-dislocation: case-control study.经皮交叉螺钉固定与切开复位内固定治疗骨盆 Day Ⅱ型新月形骨折脱位的比较:病例对照研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jan 9;16(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02197-1.
10
Functional outcome of unstable pelvic ring injuries after iliosacral screw fixation: single versus two screw fixation.骶髂螺钉固定后不稳定骨盆环损伤的功能预后:单枚螺钉与双枚螺钉固定对比
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015 Aug;41(4):387-92. doi: 10.1007/s00068-014-0456-x. Epub 2014 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Biomechanical performance evaluation of SAI combine with LC-2 screw for day II pelvic crescent fracture dislocation via finite element analysis.通过有限元分析对SAI联合LC-2螺钉治疗Ⅱ型骨盆新月形骨折脱位的生物力学性能评估
Sci Rep. 2025 May 14;15(1):16765. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00156-6.
2
Special screw corridors and imaging in pelvic ring trauma.骨盆环创伤中的特殊螺钉通道与影像学
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Jan 4;145(1):110. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05610-0.
3
Comparison of the AO/OTA 1996/2007 and 2018 pelvic ring fracture classifications.
AO/OTA 1996/2007 与 2018 骨盆环骨折分类的比较。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Oct;144(10):4587-4593. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05557-2. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
4
Open reduction and internal fixation of crescent fracture-dislocation: anterior or posterior approach?新月形骨折脱位的切开复位内固定:前路还是后路?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Mar;144(3):1269-1279. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05185-2. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
5
Effect of medical choice and health behavior on the health status for patients with subluxation of the sacroiliac joint.医学选择和健康行为对骶髂关节半脱位患者健康状况的影响。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Dec 15;102(50):e36721. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036721.
6
[Finite element analysis of five internal fixation modes in treatment of Day type crescent fracture dislocation of pelvis].骨盆Day型新月形骨折脱位五种内固定方式治疗的有限元分析
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Oct 15;37(10):1205-1213. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202306043.
7
Complications of conventional percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation of traumatic pelvic ring injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.传统经皮骶髂螺钉固定治疗创伤性骨盆环损伤的并发症:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Oct;33(7):3107-3117. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03543-9. Epub 2023 Apr 8.
8
Treating sacroiliac joint dislocation through percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation with the aid of 2 fluoroscopes: a novel technique.借助双荧光镜经皮骶髂螺钉固定治疗骶髂关节脱位:一种新技术
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021 May;11(5):2076-2084. doi: 10.21037/qims-20-448.
9
Concerns regarding biomechanical stability of different fixations models in crescent fracture dislocation.关于新月形骨折脱位中不同固定模型生物力学稳定性的担忧。
J Orthop Translat. 2020 Oct 9;26:181-182. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2020.08.004. eCollection 2021 Jan.
10
Comparison of percutaneous cross screw fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation for pelvic Day type II crescent fracture-dislocation: case-control study.经皮交叉螺钉固定与切开复位内固定治疗骨盆 Day Ⅱ型新月形骨折脱位的比较:病例对照研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jan 9;16(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02197-1.