From the Office of Extramural Research (M.S.L.) and the Center for Scientific Review (R.N.), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 12;373(20):1893-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1507427.
Recent reports suggest that peer reviews of National Institutes of Health grant applications are at best imprecise predictors of research projects' scientific impact. But these findings may not mean that peer review is failing.
最近的报告表明,美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)资助申请的同行评议最多只能算是对研究项目科学影响力的不精确预测。但这些发现并不意味着同行评议失败了。