Hill Joseph A
Department of Internal Medicine (Cardiology), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
J Electrocardiol. 2016 Mar-Apr;49(2):109-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Jan 9.
Manuscript peer review is fundamental to the evaluation and dissemination of modern science; it is the process whereby good science is enhanced and bad science is dismissed. Very little objective evidence, however, has been amassed to guide the manuscript peer review process. Rather, it is learned by experience and mentoring: by doing reviews, receiving reviews of one's own work, and by obtaining feedback from seasoned reviewers. Here, I lay out my perspective on this cornerstone of the scientific endeavor.
稿件同行评审是现代科学评估与传播的基础；它是一个强化优秀科学成果并摒弃劣质科学成果的过程。然而，几乎没有积累到客观证据来指导稿件同行评审过程。相反，它是通过经验和指导来学习的：通过进行评审、接受对自己工作的评审以及从经验丰富的评审人员那里获得反馈。在此，我阐述我对这一科学事业基石的看法。
