Suppr超能文献

用于估计自行车测力计最大摄氧量的性别特异性方程。

Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle Ergometry.

作者信息

Souza e Silva Christina G de, Araújo Claudio Gil S

机构信息

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Cardiologia, Instituto do Coração Edson Saad, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

出版信息

Arq Bras Cardiol. 2015 Oct;105(4):381-9. doi: 10.5935/abc.20150089. Epub 2015 Jul 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aerobic fitness, assessed by measuring VO2max in maximum cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) or by estimating VO2max through the use of equations in exercise testing, is a predictor of mortality. However, the error resulting from this estimate in a given individual can be high, affecting clinical decisions.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the error of estimate of VO2max in cycle ergometry in a population attending clinical exercise testing laboratories, and to propose sex-specific equations to minimize that error.

METHODS

This study assessed 1715 adults (18 to 91 years, 68% men) undertaking maximum CPX in a lower limbs cycle ergometer (LLCE) with ramp protocol. The percentage error (E%) between measured VO2max and that estimated from the modified ACSM equation (Lang et al. MSSE, 1992) was calculated. Then, estimation equations were developed: 1) for all the population tested (C-GENERAL); and 2) separately by sex (C-MEN and C-WOMEN).

RESULTS

Measured VO2max was higher in men than in WOMEN: -29.4 ± 10.5 and 24.2 ± 9.2 mL.(kg.min)-1 (p < 0.01). The equations for estimating VO2max [in mL.(kg.min)-1] were: C-GENERAL = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 10.483 + 7; C-MEN = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 10.791 + 7; and C-WOMEN = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 9.820 + 7. The E% for MEN was: -3.4 ± 13.4% (modified ACSM); 1.2 ± 13.2% (C-GENERAL); and -0.9 ± 13.4% (C-MEN) (p < 0.01). For WOMEN: -14.7 ± 17.4% (modified ACSM); -6.3 ± 16.5% (C-GENERAL); and -1.7 ± 16.2% (C-WOMEN) (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The error of estimate of VO2max by use of sex-specific equations was reduced, but not eliminated, in exercise tests on LLCE.

摘要

背景

通过在最大心肺运动测试(CPX)中测量最大摄氧量(VO2max)或在运动测试中使用公式估算VO2max来评估的有氧适能是死亡率的一个预测指标。然而,在特定个体中这种估算所产生的误差可能很大,从而影响临床决策。

目的

确定在临床运动测试实验室进行测试的人群中,下肢蹬车运动测试时VO2max的估算误差,并提出针对性别的公式以尽量减少该误差。

方法

本研究评估了1715名成年人(年龄18至91岁,68%为男性),他们在下肢蹬车测力计(LLCE)上采用斜坡方案进行最大CPX测试。计算测量的VO2max与根据改良的美国运动医学学会(ACSM)公式(Lang等人,《运动科学与医学杂志》,1992年)估算的VO2max之间的百分比误差(E%)。然后,制定了估算公式:1)针对所有测试人群(C - 通用公式);2)按性别分别制定(C - 男性公式和C - 女性公式)。

结果

男性测量的VO2max高于女性:分别为-29.4±10.5和24.2±9.2 mL·(kg·min)-1(p<0.01)。估算VO2max[单位为mL·(kg·min)-1]的公式为:C - 通用公式 = [最终工作量(W)/体重(kg)]×10.483 + 7;C - 男性公式 = [最终工作量(W)/体重(kg)]×10.791 + 7;C - 女性公式 = [最终工作量(W)/体重(kg)]×9.820 + 7。男性的E%分别为:-3.4±13.4%(改良ACSM公式);1.2±13.2%(C - 通用公式);-0.9±13.4%(C - 男性公式)(p<0.01)。女性的E%分别为:-14.7±17.4%(改良ACSM公式);-6.3±16.5%(C - 通用公式);-1.7±16.2%(C - 女性公式)(p<0.01)。

结论

在LLCE运动测试中,使用针对性别的公式可减少但不能消除VO2max的估算误差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe5/4633002/bb3b502674e4/abc-105-04-0381-g01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验