Manriquez Juan, Cataldo Karina, Harz Isidora
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Luis Tisne Brousse Hospital, Santiago, Chile.
An Bras Dermatol. 2015 Sep-Oct;90(5):646-52. doi: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20153979.
Disseminating information derived from systematic reviews is a fundamental step for translating evidence into practice.
To determine which features of dermatological SR are associated with systematic review dissemination, using citation rates as an indicator.
Dermatological systematic reviews published between 2008 and 2012 were obtained from Scopus, the ISI Web of Sciences and the Cochrane Skin Group. Bibliometric data of every systematic review were collected and analyzed.
A total of 320 systematic reviews were analyzed. Univariable analysis showed that the journal impact factor, number of authors, and total references cited were positively associated with the number of citations. There was a significant difference in the median number of citations with regard to the corresponding author's country, type of skin disease, type of funding, and presence of international collaboration. Cochrane reviews were significantly associated with a lower number of citations. Multivariable analysis found that the number of authors, number of references cited and the corresponding author from United Kingdom were independently correlated with many citations. Cochrane systematic reviews tended to be independently associated with a lower number of citations.
Citation number to systematic reviews may be improving by increasing the number of authors, especially collaborative authors, and the number of cited references. The reasons for the association of Cochrane SRs with fewer citations should be addressed in future studies.
传播系统评价得出的信息是将证据转化为实践的基本步骤。
以引用率为指标,确定皮肤科系统评价的哪些特征与系统评价的传播相关。
从Scopus、科学引文索引(ISI)数据库和Cochrane皮肤组获取2008年至2012年发表的皮肤科系统评价。收集并分析每项系统评价的文献计量数据。
共分析了320项系统评价。单变量分析显示,期刊影响因子、作者数量和总被引参考文献数量与被引次数呈正相关。在相应作者所在国家、皮肤病类型、资金类型和国际合作情况方面,被引次数中位数存在显著差异。Cochrane系统评价与较低的被引次数显著相关。多变量分析发现,作者数量、被引参考文献数量以及来自英国的通讯作者与较多的被引次数独立相关。Cochrane系统评价往往与较低的被引次数独立相关。
可通过增加作者数量,尤其是合作作者数量以及被引参考文献数量来提高系统评价的被引次数。Cochrane系统评价被引次数较少的相关原因应在未来研究中加以探讨。