• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2012年通过医疗救助管理式医疗计划为加利福尼亚州低收入人群开展的健康促进干预措施

Health Promotion Interventions for Low-Income Californians Through Medi-Cal Managed Care Plans, 2012.

作者信息

Backman Desiree R, Kohatsu Neal D, Paciotti Brian M, Byrne Jennifer V, Kizer Kenneth W

机构信息

California Department of Health Care Services, 1501 Capitol Ave, Ste 71.6129, MS 0000, PO Box 997413, Sacramento, CA 95899-7413. Email:

California Department of Health Care Services, Sacramento, California; Brian M. Paciotti, Optum Data Management, Sacramento, California, and California Department of Health Care Services, Sacramento, California.

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Nov 12;12:E196. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.150269.

DOI:10.5888/pcd12.150269
PMID:26564012
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4651139/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Prevention is the most cost-effective approach to promote population health, yet little is known about the delivery of health promotion interventions in the nation's largest Medicaid program, Medi-Cal. The purpose of this study was to inventory health promotion interventions delivered through Medi-Cal Managed Care Plans; identify attributes of the interventions that plans judged to have the greatest impact on their members; and determine the extent to which the plans refer members to community assistance programs and sponsor health-promoting community activities.

METHODS

The lead health educator from each managed care plan was asked to complete a 190-item online survey in January 2013; 20 of 21 managed care plans responded. Survey data on the health promotion interventions with the greatest impact were grouped according to intervention attributes and measures of effectiveness; quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Health promotion interventions judged to have the greatest impact on Medi-Cal members were delivered in various ways; educational materials, one-on-one education, and group classes were delivered most frequently. Behavior change, knowledge gain, and improved disease management were cited most often as measures of effectiveness. Across all interventions, median educational hours were limited (2.4 h), and median Medi-Cal member participation was low (265 members per intervention). Most interventions with greatest impact (120 of 137 [88%]) focused on tertiary prevention. There were mixed results in referring members to community assistance programs and investing in community activities.

CONCLUSION

Managed care plans have many opportunities to more effectively deliver health promotion interventions. Establishing measurable, evidence-based, consensus standards for such programs could facilitate improved delivery of these services.

摘要

引言

预防是促进人群健康最具成本效益的方法,但对于在全国最大的医疗补助计划——加州医疗补助计划(Medi-Cal)中开展的健康促进干预措施,我们却知之甚少。本研究的目的是清点通过加州医疗补助计划管理式医疗计划提供的健康促进干预措施;确定那些被计划方认为对其成员影响最大的干预措施的属性;并确定计划方将成员转介至社区援助计划以及赞助促进健康的社区活动的程度。

方法

2013年1月,要求每个管理式医疗计划的首席健康教育工作者完成一项包含190个项目的在线调查;21个管理式医疗计划中有20个做出了回应。关于影响最大的健康促进干预措施的调查数据,根据干预措施的属性和有效性指标进行了分组;定量数据采用描述性统计进行分析。

结果

被认为对加州医疗补助计划成员影响最大的健康促进干预措施以多种方式提供;教育材料、一对一教育和小组课程最为常见。行为改变、知识获取和疾病管理改善最常被引为有效性指标。在所有干预措施中,教育时长中位数有限(2.4小时),加州医疗补助计划成员参与度中位数较低(每项干预措施265名成员)。大多数影响最大的干预措施(137项中的120项[88%])侧重于三级预防。在将成员转介至社区援助计划和投资社区活动方面,结果不一。

结论

管理式医疗计划有很多机会更有效地提供健康促进干预措施。为此类计划制定可衡量、基于证据的共识标准,有助于改善这些服务的提供。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a273/4651139/596f69fac517/PCD-12-E196s01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a273/4651139/596f69fac517/PCD-12-E196s01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a273/4651139/596f69fac517/PCD-12-E196s01.jpg

相似文献

1
Health Promotion Interventions for Low-Income Californians Through Medi-Cal Managed Care Plans, 2012.2012年通过医疗救助管理式医疗计划为加利福尼亚州低收入人群开展的健康促进干预措施
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Nov 12;12:E196. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.150269.
2
In California, Medi-Cal managed care is superior to Medi-Cal fee-for-service.在加利福尼亚州,医疗补助管理式医疗比医疗补助按服务收费模式更具优势。
Manag Care Q. 1998 Autumn;6(4):7-14.
3
Low-income Californians' experiences with health insurance and managed care.加利福尼亚州低收入人群的医疗保险和管理式医疗体验。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2001 Nov;12(4):446-60. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2010.0801.
4
Medi-Cal managed care.医疗救助管理式医疗
Calif Hosp. 1992 Jul-Aug;6(4):8-15.
5
Inequality of access to surgical specialty health care: why children with government-funded insurance have less access than those with private insurance in Southern California.外科专科医疗保健的可及性不平等:为何在南加州,拥有政府资助保险的儿童比拥有私人保险的儿童获得的医疗服务更少。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e584-90. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0210.
6
Jury still out on DHS' Medi-Cal managed care plan.对于美国国土安全部的医疗补助管理式医疗计划,尚无定论。
Calif Hosp. 1993 May-Jun;7(3):19-20.
7
The Medi-Cal Incentives to Quit Smoking Project: Impact of Statewide Outreach Through Health Channels.美加州戒烟激励项目:通过健康渠道在全州范围内开展宣传的影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Dec;55(6 Suppl 2):S159-S169. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.07.031.
8
Capitation a successful reimbursement mechanism for California Medi-Cal.人头费:加利福尼亚医疗补助计划的一种成功报销机制。
Capitation Rates Data. 2004 Aug;9(8):94-6.
9
Financial performance and participation in Medicaid and Medi-Cal managed care.财务绩效以及对医疗补助计划和加州医疗补助管理式医疗的参与情况。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2001 Winter;23(2):69-81.
10
Implementing a Quality Improvement Collaborative to Improve Hypertension Control and Advance Million Hearts Among Low-Income Californians, 2014-2015.实施质量改进合作,以改善高血压控制和推进低收入加州的“百万心脏”计划,2014-2015 年。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2017 Jul 27;14:E61. doi: 10.5888/pcd14.160587.

引用本文的文献

1
Adaptation and implementation outcomes of a parenting program for low-income, ethnically diverse families delivered virtually versus in-person.一项针对低收入、种族多样化家庭的亲职教育计划的适应和实施结果,该计划以虚拟方式而非面对面方式提供。
Transl Behav Med. 2022 Nov 21;12(11):1065-1075. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac077.
2
Barriers to the implementation of sexual and reproductive health education programmes in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review protocol.低收入和中等收入国家实施性与生殖健康教育项目的障碍:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 15;9(10):e030814. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030814.

本文引用的文献

1
CDC National Health Report: leading causes of morbidity and mortality and associated behavioral risk and protective factors--United States, 2005-2013.美国疾病控制与预防中心国家健康报告:2005 - 2013年美国发病和死亡的主要原因以及相关行为风险和保护因素
MMWR Suppl. 2014 Oct 31;63(4):3-27.
2
Complete care at Kaiser Permanente: transforming chronic and preventive care.凯撒医疗集团的全面护理:变革慢性疾病与预防保健服务
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013 Nov;39(11):484-94. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(13)39064-3.
3
Broadening the focus: the need to address the social determinants of health.
拓宽关注范围:应对健康的社会决定因素的必要性。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Jan;40(1 Suppl 1):S4-18. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.10.002.
4
The Kaiser Permanente Community Health Initiative: overview and evaluation design.凯萨永久社区健康倡议:概述与评估设计。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Nov;100(11):2111-3. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300001.
5
Promoting prevention through the Affordable Care Act.通过《平价医疗法案》促进预防工作。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 30;363(14):1296-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1008560. Epub 2010 Aug 25.
6
Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health.消除一代人之间的差距:通过针对健康的社会决定因素采取行动实现健康公平。
Lancet. 2008 Nov 8;372(9650):1661-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61690-6.
7
Breastfeeding and maternal and infant health outcomes in developed countries.发达国家的母乳喂养与母婴健康结局
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007 Apr(153):1-186.
8
Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000.2000年美国的实际死因
JAMA. 2004 Mar 10;291(10):1238-45. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.10.1238.
9
The expanded Chronic Care Model: an integration of concepts and strategies from population health promotion and the Chronic Care Model.扩展的慢性病照护模式:整合来自人群健康促进和慢性病照护模式的概念与策略。
Hosp Q. 2003;7(1):73-82. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2003.16763.
10
Effect of the transformation of the Veterans Affairs Health Care System on the quality of care.退伍军人事务医疗保健系统转型对医疗质量的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2003 May 29;348(22):2218-27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa021899.