阴茎植入手术中严重纤维化管理策略的批判性评估与综述
Critical Appraisal and Review of Management Strategies for Severe Fibrosis During Penile Implant Surgery.
作者信息
Trost Landon, Patil Mukul, Kramer Andrew
机构信息
Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
出版信息
J Sex Med. 2015 Nov;12 Suppl 7:439-47. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12985.
INTRODUCTION
Penile corporal fibrosis represents a challenging clinical scenario for surgeons placing penile prostheses (PP). Because of its rarity, a small number of series with limited follow-up have reported outcomes in this cohort.
AIM
The aim of this study was to perform a critical appraisal of the corporal excavation technique, discuss its relevance to contemporary practice, and review alternative surgical methods and outcomes.
METHODS
A critical review was performed of the 2006 article by Montague and Angermeier, "Corporeal excavation: new technique for penile prosthesis implantation in men with severe corporeal fibrosis." Notable inclusions and omissions were described, with emphasis placed on methodology and outcomes. A PubMed search from 1990 to June 2015 was then performed to review and summarize the literature on managing corporal fibrosis during PP surgery.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
The main outcome measures used were the major contributions and limitations of the 2006 article describing outcomes of the corporal excavation technique.
RESULTS
Corporal excavation is a relevant surgical technique for managing severe corporal fibrosis. Compared with alternatives, excavation achieves successful placement of PP without need for grafting and with few complications. The article was limited by several notable omissions including relevant patient demographic and disease characteristics, patient selection, and minimal descriptions of complications and outcomes. Alternative techniques include use of specialized dilators, counter incisions, reconstruction with graft placement, minimal scar tissue excision, and endoscopic resection. Because of limited data, no specific algorithm for managing corporal fibrosis can be prescribed.
CONCLUSIONS
Corporal fibrosis is a challenging clinical scenario and requires surgical experience and specialized techniques to manage appropriately. Corporal excavation represents one of several viable techniques, which may be chosen based on surgeon's preference and clinical factors.
引言
阴茎海绵体纤维化对外科医生植入阴茎假体(PP)来说是一个具有挑战性的临床情况。由于其罕见性,仅有少数随访有限的系列报道了该队列的结果。
目的
本研究的目的是对海绵体挖掘技术进行批判性评估,讨论其与当代实践的相关性,并回顾其他手术方法及结果。
方法
对蒙塔古和安格迈尔2006年发表的文章《海绵体挖掘:重度海绵体纤维化男性阴茎假体植入的新技术》进行了批判性综述。描述了显著的纳入和遗漏内容,重点放在方法和结果上。然后进行了从1990年至2015年6月的PubMed检索,以回顾和总结阴茎假体手术期间处理海绵体纤维化的文献。
主要观察指标
所使用的主要观察指标是2006年描述海绵体挖掘技术结果的文章的主要贡献和局限性。
结果
海绵体挖掘是处理重度海绵体纤维化的一种相关手术技术。与其他方法相比,挖掘可成功植入阴茎假体,无需移植且并发症少。该文章存在一些显著遗漏,包括相关患者人口统计学和疾病特征、患者选择以及对并发症和结果的描述极少。其他技术包括使用专门的扩张器、对侧切口、移植重建、最小限度的瘢痕组织切除和内镜切除。由于数据有限,无法制定处理海绵体纤维化的具体算法。
结论
海绵体纤维化是一个具有挑战性的临床情况,需要手术经验和专门技术来妥善处理。海绵体挖掘是几种可行技术之一,可根据外科医生的偏好和临床因素来选择。