Lienhard Karin, Cabasson Aline, Meste Olivier, Colson Serge S
University of Nice Sophia Antipolis, CNRS, I3S, UMR7271, Sophia Antipolis, France; University of Nice Sophia Antipolis, LAMHESS, EA 6312, Nice, France; University of Toulon, LAMHESS, EA 6312, La Garde, France.
University of Nice Sophia Antipolis, CNRS, I3S, UMR7271, Sophia Antipolis, France.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2015 Dec;25(6):833-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
The objective was to investigate the influence of surface electromyography (sEMG) processing methods on the quantification of muscle activity during whole-body vibration (WBV) exercises. sEMG activity was recorded while the participants performed squats on the platform with and without WBV. The spikes observed in the sEMG spectrum at the vibration frequency and its harmonics were deleted using state-of-the-art methods, i.e. (1) a band-stop filter, (2) a band-pass filter, and (3) spectral linear interpolation. The same filtering methods were applied on the sEMG during the no-vibration trial. The linear interpolation method showed the highest intraclass correlation coefficients (no vibration: 0.999, WBV: 0.757-0.979) with the comparison measure (unfiltered sEMG during the no-vibration trial), followed by the band-stop filter (no vibration: 0.929-0.975, WBV: 0.661-0.938). While both methods introduced a systematic bias (P < 0.001), the error increased with increasing mean values to a higher degree for the band-stop filter. After adjusting the sEMG(RMS) during WBV for the bias, the performance of the interpolation method and the band-stop filter was comparable. The band-pass filter was in poor agreement with the other methods (ICC: 0.207-0.697), unless the sEMG(RMS) was corrected for the bias (ICC ⩾ 0.931, %LOA ⩽ 32.3). In conclusion, spectral linear interpolation or a band-stop filter centered at the vibration frequency and its multiple harmonics should be applied to delete the artifacts in the sEMG signals during WBV. With the use of a band-stop filter it is recommended to correct the sEMG(RMS) for the bias as this procedure improved its performance.
目的是研究表面肌电图(sEMG)处理方法对全身振动(WBV)运动期间肌肉活动量化的影响。在参与者在有和没有WBV的平台上进行深蹲时记录sEMG活动。使用最先进的方法删除在振动频率及其谐波处的sEMG频谱中观察到的尖峰,即:(1)带阻滤波器,(2)带通滤波器,以及(3)频谱线性插值。在无振动试验期间,对sEMG应用相同的滤波方法。线性插值方法与比较测量值(无振动试验期间未滤波的sEMG)显示出最高的组内相关系数(无振动:0.999,WBV:0.757 - 0.979),其次是带阻滤波器(无振动:0.929 - 0.975,WBV:0.661 - 0.938)。虽然这两种方法都引入了系统偏差(P < 0.001),但对于带阻滤波器,误差随着平均值的增加而以更高的程度增加。在对WBV期间的sEMG(RMS)进行偏差调整后,插值方法和带阻滤波器的性能相当。带通滤波器与其他方法的一致性较差(ICC:0.207 - 0.697),除非对sEMG(RMS)进行偏差校正(ICC⩾0.931,%LOA⩽32.3)。总之,应应用频谱线性插值或中心位于振动频率及其多个谐波处的带阻滤波器来消除WBV期间sEMG信号中的伪迹。使用带阻滤波器时,建议对sEMG(RMS)进行偏差校正,因为此过程改善了其性能。