Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Gut. 2017 Mar;66(3):411-420. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310721. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
OBJECTIVE: Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a chronic gastroduodenal disorder. Individuals with FD demonstrate visceral hypersensitivity, abnormal central pain processing, and low mood, but it is unclear whether psychotropic drugs are an effective treatment for the condition. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). DESIGN: MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMBASE Classic, PsychINFO and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched (up to June 2015) for RCTs recruiting adults with FD comparing psychotropic drugs with placebo. We contacted authors directly to maximise trial eligibility and minimise risk of bias for studies. Dichotomous symptom data were pooled to obtain relative risk (RR) of remaining symptomatic after therapy, with 95% CIs. RESULTS: The search identified 2795 citations; 13 RCTs (1241 patients) were eligible. Ten trials were at low risk of bias. The RR of FD symptoms not improving with psychotropic drugs versus placebo was 0.78 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.91) (number needed to treat=6; 95% CI 4 to 16). However, benefit was limited to antipsychotics and tricyclic antidepressants. When only studies that excluded individuals with coexistent mood disorder were considered, there was no benefit. Total numbers of adverse events and adverse events leading to withdrawal were significantly more common, with a number needed to harm of 21 for both. CONCLUSIONS: Psychotropic drugs may be an effective treatment for FD, but the effect appears to be limited to antipsychotics and tricyclic antidepressants with fewer trials for other agents, meaning that firm conclusions for efficacy cannot be made. More data from high quality RCTs are required to support their use in the treatment of FD.
目的:功能性消化不良(FD)是一种慢性胃十二指肠疾病。FD 患者表现为内脏高敏性、疼痛处理异常和情绪低落,但尚不清楚精神药物是否是治疗该疾病的有效方法。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析的随机对照试验(RCT)。
设计:MEDLINE、EMBASE、EMBASE Classic、PsychINFO 和 Cochrane 对照试验登记处(截至 2015 年 6 月)对招募 FD 成人患者的 RCT 进行了检索,比较了精神药物与安慰剂。我们直接联系作者,以最大限度地提高试验的合格性,并最大限度地减少研究偏倚的风险。二分类症状数据被汇总以获得治疗后仍有症状的相对风险(RR),并给出 95%置信区间。
结果:搜索共确定了 2795 条引文;13 项 RCT(1241 例患者)符合条件。10 项试验的偏倚风险较低。与安慰剂相比,精神药物治疗 FD 症状无改善的 RR 为 0.78(95%CI 0.68 至 0.91)(需要治疗的人数=6;95%CI 4 至 16)。然而,这种益处仅限于抗精神病药和三环类抗抑郁药。当仅考虑排除并存情绪障碍患者的研究时,没有益处。总的不良事件和导致停药的不良事件数量明显更多,需要治疗的人数分别为 21。
结论:精神药物可能是 FD 的有效治疗方法,但效果似乎仅限于抗精神病药和三环类抗抑郁药,其他药物的试验较少,因此无法确定疗效的确切结论。需要更多高质量 RCT 的数据来支持它们在 FD 治疗中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-11-21
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-8-5
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-3-8
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005-7-20
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-11-14
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-10-19
Health Technol Assess. 2024-10
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023-10-31
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023-7-30