• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有意义使用的护理协调标准:初级保健提供者所感知到的障碍和益处

Meaningful use care coordination criteria: Perceived barriers and benefits among primary care providers.

作者信息

Cohen Genna R, Adler-Milstein Julia

机构信息

School of Public Health (Health Management and Policy), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

School of Information and School of Public Health (Health Management and Policy), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Apr;23(e1):e146-51. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv147. Epub 2015 Nov 13.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocv147
PMID:26567327
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4954634/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stage 2 and proposed Stage 3 meaningful use criteria ask providers to support patient care coordination by electronically generating, exchanging, and reconciling key information during patient care transitions.

METHODS

A stratified random sample of primary care practices in Michigan (n = 328) that had already met Stage 1 meaningful use criteria was surveyed, in order to identify the anticipated barriers to meeting these criteria as well as the expected impact on patient care coordination from doing so.

RESULTS

The top three barriers, as identified by >65% of the primary care providers surveyed, were difficulty sending and receiving patient information electronically, a lack of provider and practice staff time, and the complex workflow changes required. Despite these barriers, primary care providers expressed strong agreement that meeting the proposed Stage 3 care coordination criteria would improve their patients' treatment and ensure they know about their patients' visits to other providers.

CONCLUSION

The survey results suggest the need to enhance policy approaches and organizational strategies to address the key barriers identified by providers and practices in order to realize important care coordination benefits.

摘要

背景

第二阶段以及拟议中的第三阶段的有意义使用标准要求医疗服务提供者在患者护理过渡期间通过电子方式生成、交换和核对关键信息来支持患者护理协调。

方法

对密歇根州已经符合第一阶段有意义使用标准的基层医疗实践进行分层随机抽样调查(n = 328),以确定满足这些标准的预期障碍以及这样做对患者护理协调的预期影响。

结果

超过65%的接受调查的基层医疗服务提供者认为,排名前三的障碍是电子方式发送和接收患者信息困难、医疗服务提供者和实践工作人员时间不足以及所需的复杂工作流程变更。尽管存在这些障碍,基层医疗服务提供者仍强烈认同,满足拟议中的第三阶段护理协调标准将改善患者治疗并确保他们了解患者去其他医疗服务提供者处就诊的情况。

结论

调查结果表明,需要加强政策措施和组织策略,以解决医疗服务提供者和实践中发现的关键障碍,从而实现重要的护理协调效益。

相似文献

1
Meaningful use care coordination criteria: Perceived barriers and benefits among primary care providers.有意义使用的护理协调标准:初级保健提供者所感知到的障碍和益处
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Apr;23(e1):e146-51. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv147. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
2
Improving EHR Capabilities to Facilitate Stage 3 Meaningful Use Care Coordination Criteria.提升电子健康记录功能以促进符合第3阶段有意义使用的医疗协调标准
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2015 Nov 5;2015:448-55. eCollection 2015.
3
Stage 1 of the meaningful use incentive program for electronic health records: a study of readiness for change in ambulatory practice settings in one integrated delivery system.电子健康记录有意义使用激励计划的第一阶段:对一个综合医疗服务体系中门诊实践环境变革准备情况的研究
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Dec 14;14:119. doi: 10.1186/s12911-014-0119-1.
4
Meeting meaningful use criteria and managing patient populations: a national survey of practicing physicians.达到有意义使用标准和管理患者群体:对执业医师的全国性调查。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Jun 4;158(11):791-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-11-201306040-00003.
5
Learning from primary care meaningful use exemplars.从初级保健有意义使用范例中学习。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 May-Jun;28(3):360-70. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.03.140219.
6
The journey of primary care practices to meaningful use: a Colorado Beacon Consortium study.初级保健实践迈向有意义使用的历程:科罗拉多灯塔联盟研究。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2013 Sep-Oct;26(5):603-11. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.05.120344.
7
Health IT-Enabled Care Coordination: A National Survey of Patient-Centered Medical Home Clinicians.基于健康信息技术的医疗协调:以患者为中心的家庭医疗临床医生全国性调查。
Ann Fam Med. 2015 May-Jun;13(3):250-6. doi: 10.1370/afm.1797.
8
Assessing the Quality of the After-Visit Summary (AVS) in a Primary-Care Clinic.评估初级保健诊所的就诊后总结(AVS)质量。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Jan-Feb;32(1):65-68. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.01.180055.
9
Physician experience with electronic health record systems that meet meaningful use criteria: NAMCS physician workflow survey, 2011.符合有意义使用标准的电子健康记录系统的医生体验:2011年国家门诊医疗调查(NAMCS)医生工作流程调查
NCHS Data Brief. 2013 Sep(129):1-8.
10
Sustaining "meaningful use" of health information technology in low-resource practices.在资源匮乏的医疗机构中维持健康信息技术的“有意义使用”。
Ann Fam Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;13(1):17-22. doi: 10.1370/afm.1740.

引用本文的文献

1
Physician experiences of electronic health record interoperability and its practical impact on care delivery in the English NHS: a cross-sectional survey study.英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)中医生对电子健康记录互操作性的体验及其对医疗服务提供的实际影响:一项横断面调查研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 10;15(6):e096669. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096669.
2
Successes and Barriers of Health Information Exchange Participation Across Hospitals in South Carolina From 2014 to 2020: Longitudinal Observational Study.2014年至2020年南卡罗来纳州各医院健康信息交换参与情况的成功与障碍:纵向观察研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2023 Sep 28;11:e40959. doi: 10.2196/40959.
3
Do Market Characteristics Matter? Factors Associated with Health Information Exchange.市场特征重要吗?与健康信息交换相关的因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 15;18(22):11976. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211976.
4
Practice and market factors associated with provider volume of health information exchange.与健康信息交换提供者数量相关的实践和市场因素。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Jul 14;28(7):1451-1460. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab024.
5
Technology-facilitated care coordination in rural areas: What is needed?技术支持的农村地区医疗协调服务:需要什么?
Int J Med Inform. 2020 May;137:104102. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104102. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
6
Impacts of Operational Failures on Primary Care Physicians' Work: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis of the Literature.操作性失误对基层医疗医师工作的影响:文献的批判性综合分析。
Ann Fam Med. 2020 Mar;18(2):159-168. doi: 10.1370/afm.2485.
7
A Clinical Care Monitoring and Data Collection Tool (H3 Tracker) to Assess Uptake and Engagement in Mental Health Care Services in a Community-Based Pediatric Integrated Care Model: Longitudinal Cohort Study.一种用于评估社区儿科综合护理模式下心理健康护理服务的接受情况和参与度的临床护理监测与数据收集工具(H3追踪器):纵向队列研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2019 Apr 23;6(4):e12358. doi: 10.2196/12358.
8
Public Health Data for Individual Patient Care: Mapping Poison Control Center Data to the C-CDA Consultation Note.用于个体患者护理的公共卫生数据:将中毒控制中心数据映射到C-CDA会诊记录。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017 Feb 10;2016:1850-1859. eCollection 2016.
9
Screening Consolidated Clinical Document Architecture (CCDA) Documents for Sensitive Data Using a Rule-Based Decision Support System.使用基于规则的决策支持系统筛选综合临床文档架构(CCDA)文档中的敏感数据。
Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Feb 8;8(1):137-148. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2016-07-RA-0120.
10
Overcoming barriers to diabetic polyneuropathy management in primary care.克服初级保健中糖尿病多发性神经病管理的障碍。
Healthc (Amst). 2017 Dec;5(4):171-173. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Dec 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Michigan's fee-for-value physician incentive program reduces spending and improves quality in primary care.密歇根州的价值付费医生激励计划降低了支出并提高了初级医疗保健的质量。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Apr;34(4):645-52. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0426.
2
Despite substantial progress In EHR adoption, health information exchange and patient engagement remain low in office settings.尽管电子健康记录(EHR)的采用取得了实质性进展,但在医疗机构中,健康信息交换和患者参与度仍然较低。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Sep;33(9):1672-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0445. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
3
Physician organization-practice team integration for the advancement of patient-centered care.医师组织与实践团队整合以推进以患者为中心的医疗服务。
J Ambul Care Manage. 2012 Oct-Dec;35(4):311-22. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e3182606e7c.
4
Six features of Medicare coordinated care demonstration programs that cut hospital admissions of high-risk patients.六种降低高风险患者住院率的医疗保险协调护理示范项目的特点。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Jun;31(6):1156-66. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0393.
5
Journey toward a patient-centered medical home: readiness for change in primary care practices.迈向以患者为中心的医疗之家的旅程:初级保健实践变革的准备情况。
Milbank Q. 2011 Sep;89(3):399-424. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00634.x.
6
A survey of health information exchange organizations in the United States: implications for meaningful use.美国健康信息交换组织调查:对有意义使用的启示。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 May 17;154(10):666-71. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-10-201105170-00006.
7
Health information technology: laying the infrastructure for national health reform.卫生信息技术:为国家卫生改革奠定基础。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jun;29(6):1214-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0503.
8
How the electronic health record did not measure up to the demands of our medical home practice.电子健康记录如何无法满足我们医疗之家实践的要求。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Apr;29(4):622-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0065.
9
Launching HITECH.启动《健康信息技术经济与临床健康法案》(或:启动医疗信息技术促进经济和临床健康计划) (注:HITECH一般指Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health,具体含义需结合上下文确定)
N Engl J Med. 2010 Feb 4;362(5):382-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0912825. Epub 2009 Dec 30.
10
Are electronic medical records helpful for care coordination? Experiences of physician practices.电子病历有助于医疗协调吗?——医师实践的经验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Mar;25(3):177-85. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1195-2. Epub 2009 Dec 22.