Patterson R E, Horowitz S F
Department of Medicine (Cardiology), Emory University School of Medicine, Carlyle Fraser Heart Center, Crawford Long Hospital, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30365.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989 Jun;13(7):1653-65. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(89)90361-6.
The explosion of costly new medical diagnostic technologies demands a common sense approach to help physicians decide appropriate indications and strategies for use of these tests. This simple, nonmathematical review focuses on the assessment of coronary artery disease, but the approach can be generalized to other medical problems. This clinical approach to diagnostic testing strategies is based on seven sequential questions: 1. What is the clinical probability that this patient has a specific disease characteristic based on clinical data? 2. What is the overall objective for management of this patient based on the overall status of the patient? 3. Most importantly, what specific questions need to be answered about the patient's condition before the physician can recommend the most appropriate management (e.g., whether the patient has coronary disease, whether an anatomic lesion is functionally significant, whether a myocardial region is reversibly ischemic or irreversibly infarcted, whether a particular therapy has had good or bad effects or what is the patient's prognosis)? The key point is for the physician to formulate a specific clinical question about the patient before the test. 4. The physician must then ask how well does the test answer the particular clinical question about the patient. Here the physician needs to understand the sensitivity and specificity of the test, especially because they are influenced by various clinical biases. 5. Next, the physician must ask how to interpret the reliability of a positive or negative test result in the individual patient. This requires understanding predictive value and predictive error of a given result and how they are influenced by the clinical data as described by Bayes' theorem. 6. Next, the physician must ask what further tests or therapies will be recommended for the patient. The physician can estimate in advance how different test results would alter management plans and he can then allow this estimate to help determine indications for the test. There is some controversy concerning whether to use Bayes' theorem or multivariate analysis to estimate the final probability of a disease characteristic. 7. Finally, in this era of quality assurance, professional review and cost containment, it behooves each physician to ask whether the data provided by the particular tests were worth the cost, inconvenience and risk for that particular patient.
昂贵的新型医学诊断技术激增,这就需要一种常识性方法来帮助医生确定使用这些检测的合适指征和策略。这个简单的非数学综述聚焦于冠状动脉疾病的评估,但该方法可推广至其他医学问题。这种诊断检测策略的临床方法基于七个连续问题:1. 根据临床数据,该患者具有特定疾病特征的临床概率是多少?2. 根据患者的整体状况,对该患者进行管理的总体目标是什么?3. 最重要的是,在医生能够推荐最恰当的管理措施之前,关于患者病情需要回答哪些具体问题(例如,患者是否患有冠心病,解剖学病变在功能上是否显著,心肌区域是可逆性缺血还是不可逆性梗死,特定治疗是产生了良好还是不良效果,或者患者的预后如何)?关键在于医生在检测之前要针对患者提出一个具体的临床问题。4. 然后医生必须询问该检测对关于患者的特定临床问题的回答程度如何。在此,医生需要了解检测的敏感性和特异性,特别是因为它们会受到各种临床偏倚的影响。5. 接下来,医生必须询问如何解读个体患者检测结果为阳性或阴性的可靠性。这需要理解给定结果的预测价值和预测误差,以及它们如何受到贝叶斯定理所描述的临床数据的影响。6. 接下来,医生必须询问将为患者推荐哪些进一步的检测或治疗。医生可以提前估计不同的检测结果将如何改变管理计划,然后可以利用这个估计来帮助确定检测的指征。关于是使用贝叶斯定理还是多变量分析来估计疾病特征的最终概率存在一些争议。7. 最后,在这个质量保证、专业评审和成本控制的时代,每位医生都应该问问,特定检测所提供的数据对于该特定患者而言,是否值得其所花费的成本、带来的不便和风险。