Branca Margherita, Longatto-Filho Adhemar
Unit of Cytopathology, National Centre of Epidemiology, Surveillance and Promotion of Health, National Institute of Health (ISS), Rome, Italy.
Acta Cytol. 2015;59(5):361-9. doi: 10.1159/000441515. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
We aimed to critically evaluate the importance of quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA) strategies in the routine work of uterine cervix cytology.
We revised all the main principles of QC and QA that are already being implemented worldwide and then discussed the positive aspects and limitations of these as well as proposing alternatives when pertinent.
A literature review was introduced after highlighting the main historical revisions, and then a critical evaluation of the principal innovations in screening programmes was conducted, with recommendations being postulated.
Based on the analysed data, QC and QA are two essential arms that support the quality of a screening programme.
我们旨在严格评估质量控制(QC)和质量保证(QA)策略在子宫颈细胞学日常工作中的重要性。
我们修订了全球范围内已实施的QC和QA的所有主要原则,然后讨论了这些原则的积极方面和局限性,并在相关时提出替代方案。
在突出主要历史修订内容后引入了文献综述,然后对筛查计划中的主要创新进行了批判性评估,并提出了建议。
基于分析的数据,QC和QA是支持筛查计划质量的两个重要方面。