Johnson Daniel J, Scott Andrew V, Barodka Viachaslau M, Park Sunhee, Wasey Jack O, Ness Paul M, Gniadek Tom, Frank Steven M
From the Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine (D.J.J., A.V.S., V.M.B., S.P., J.O.W., S.M.F.) and Department of Pathology (P.M.N., T.G.), The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Anesthesiology. 2016 Feb;124(2):387-95. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000945.
It is well recognized that increased transfusion volumes are associated with increased morbidity and mortality, but dose-response relations between high- and very-high-dose transfusion and clinical outcomes have not been described previously. In this study, the authors assessed (1) the dose-response relation over a wide range of transfusion volumes for morbidity and mortality and (2) other clinical predictors of adverse outcomes.
The authors retrospectively analyzed electronic medical records for 272,592 medical and surgical patients (excluding those with hematologic malignancies), 3,523 of whom received transfusion (10 or greater erythrocyte units throughout the hospital stay), to create dose-response curves for transfusion volumes and in-hospital morbidity and mortality. Prehospital comorbidities were assessed in a risk-adjusted manner to identify the correlation with clinical outcomes.
For patients receiving high- or very-high-dose transfusion, infections and thrombotic events were four to five times more prevalent than renal, respiratory, and ischemic events. Mortality increased linearly over the entire dose range, with a 10% increase for each 10 units of erythrocytes transfused and 50% mortality after 50 erythrocyte units. Independent predictors of mortality were transfusion dose (odds ratio [OR], 1.037; 95% CI, 1.029 to 1.044), the Charlson comorbidity index (OR, 1.209; 95% CI, 1.141 to 1.276), and a history of congestive heart failure (OR, 1.482; 95% CI, 1.062 to 2.063).
Patients receiving high- or very-high-dose transfusion are at especially high risk for hospital-acquired infections and thrombotic events. Mortality increased linearly over the entire dose range and exceeded 50% after 50 erythrocyte units.
人们普遍认识到输血量大与发病率和死亡率增加相关,但此前尚未描述过高剂量和极高剂量输血与临床结局之间的剂量反应关系。在本研究中,作者评估了(1)广泛输血剂量范围内发病率和死亡率的剂量反应关系,以及(2)不良结局的其他临床预测因素。
作者回顾性分析了272592例内科和外科患者(不包括血液系统恶性肿瘤患者)的电子病历,其中3523例接受了输血(住院期间输注10个或更多红细胞单位),以创建输血剂量与住院发病率和死亡率的剂量反应曲线。以风险调整的方式评估院前合并症,以确定其与临床结局的相关性。
对于接受高剂量或极高剂量输血的患者,感染和血栓形成事件的发生率比肾脏、呼吸和缺血事件高4至5倍。死亡率在整个剂量范围内呈线性增加,每输注10个红细胞单位增加10%,输注50个红细胞单位后死亡率为50%。死亡率的独立预测因素为输血剂量(比值比[OR],1.037;95%置信区间[CI],1.029至1.044)、Charlson合并症指数(OR,1.209;95%CI,1.141至1.27)和充血性心力衰竭病史(OR,1.482;95%CI,1.062至2.063)。
接受高剂量或极高剂量输血的患者发生医院获得性感染和血栓形成事件的风险特别高。死亡率在整个剂量范围内呈线性增加,输注50个红细胞单位后超过50%。