Viehöfer Arnd F, Gerber Christian, Favre Philippe, Bachmann Elias, Snedeker Jess G
Department of Orthopedics, University of Zurich, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Institute for Biomechanics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
J Orthop Res. 2016 Jun;34(6):961-8. doi: 10.1002/jor.23104. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
Shoulders with rotator cuff tears (RCT) tears are associated with significantly larger critical shoulder angles (CSA) (RCT CSA = 38.2°) than shoulders without RCT (CSA = 32.9°). We hypothesized that larger CSAs increase the ratio of glenohumeral joint shear to joint compression forces, requiring substantially increased compensatory supraspinatus loads to stabilize the arm in abduction. A previously established three dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) model was used. Two acromion shapes mimicked the mean CSA of 38.2° found in patients with RCT and that of a normal CSA (32.9°). In a first step, the moment arms for each muscle segment were obtained for 21 different thoracohumeral abduction angles to simulate a quasi-static abduction in the scapular plane. In a second step, the muscle forces were calculated by minimizing the range of muscle stresses able to compensate an external joint moment caused by the arm weight. If the joint became unstable, additional force was applied by the rotator cuff muscles to restore joint stability. The model showed a higher joint shear to joint compressive force for the RCT CSA (38.2°) for thoracohumeral abduction angles between 40° and 90° with a peak difference of 23% at 50° of abduction. To achieve stability in this case additional rotator cuff forces exceeding physiological values were required. Our results document that a higher CSA tends to destabilize the glenohumeral joint such that higher than normal supraspinatus forces are required to maintain modeled stability during active abduction. This lends strong support to the concept that a high CSA can induce supraspinatus (SSP) overload. © 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 34:961-968, 2016.
患有肩袖撕裂(RCT)的肩部与临界肩角(CSA)显著更大(RCT的CSA = 38.2°)相关,相比没有RCT的肩部(CSA = 32.9°)。我们假设更大的CSA会增加盂肱关节剪切力与关节压缩力的比值,这需要大幅增加肩袖上的代偿负荷,以在手臂外展时稳定手臂。使用了一个先前建立的三维(3D)有限元(FE)模型。两种肩峰形状分别模拟了RCT患者中发现的平均CSA(38.2°)和正常CSA(32.9°)。第一步,针对21个不同的胸肱外展角度获取每个肌肉节段的力臂,以模拟肩胛平面内的准静态外展。第二步,通过最小化能够补偿由手臂重量引起的外部关节力矩的肌肉应力范围来计算肌肉力。如果关节变得不稳定,则由肩袖肌肉施加额外的力以恢复关节稳定性。该模型显示,对于胸肱外展角度在40°至90°之间的RCT的CSA(38.2°),关节剪切力与关节压缩力更高,在50°外展时峰值差异为23%。在这种情况下,为实现稳定性需要额外的肩袖力超过生理值。我们的结果表明,更高的CSA往往会使盂肱关节不稳定,以至于在主动外展期间需要高于正常的冈上肌力量来维持模型的稳定性。这有力地支持了高CSA可导致冈上肌(SSP)过载的概念。© 2015年骨科研究协会。由威利期刊公司出版。《矫形外科学研究》34:961 - 968,2016年。