Franklin Donna, Dalziel Stuart, Schlapbach Luregn J, Babl Franz E, Oakley Ed, Craig Simon S, Furyk Jeremy S, Neutze Jocelyn, Sinn Kam, Whitty Jennifer A, Gibbons Kristen, Fraser John, Schibler Andreas
Paediatric Critical Care Research Group, Lady Cilento Children's Hospital and The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
The University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Brisbane, Australia.
BMC Pediatr. 2015 Nov 14;15:183. doi: 10.1186/s12887-015-0501-x.
Bronchiolitis imposes the largest health care burden on non-elective paediatric hospital admissions worldwide, with up to 15 % of cases requiring admission to intensive care. A number of previous studies have failed to show benefit of pharmaceutical treatment in respect to length of stay, reduction in PICU admission rates or intubation frequency. The early use of non-invasive respiratory support devices in less intensive scenarios to facilitate earlier respiratory support may have an impact on outcome by avoiding progression of the disease process. High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) therapy has emerged as a new method to provide humidified air flow to deliver a non-invasive form of positive pressure support with titratable oxygen fraction. There is a lack of high-grade evidence on use of HFNC therapy in bronchiolitis.
METHODS/DESIGN: Prospective multi-centre randomised trial comparing standard treatment (standard subnasal oxygen) and High Flow Nasal Cannula therapy in infants with bronchiolitis admitted to 17 hospitals emergency departments and wards in Australia and New Zealand, including 12 non-tertiary regional/metropolitan and 5 tertiary centres. The primary outcome is treatment failure; defined as meeting three out of four pre-specified failure criteria requiring escalation of treatment or higher level of care; i) heart rate remains unchanged or increased compared to admission/enrolment observations, ii) respiratory rate remains unchanged or increased compared to admission/enrolment observations, iii) oxygen requirement in HFNC therapy arm exceeds FiO2 ≥ 40 % to maintain SpO2 ≥ 92 % (or ≥94 %) or oxygen requirement in standard subnasal oxygen therapy arm exceeds >2L/min to maintain SpO2 ≥ 92 % (or ≥94 %), and iv) hospital internal Early Warning Tool calls for medical review and escalation of care. Secondary outcomes include transfer to tertiary institution, admission to intensive care, length of stay, length of oxygen treatment, need for non-invasive/invasive ventilation, intubation, adverse events, and cost.
This large multicenter randomised trial will allow the definitive assessment of the efficacy of HFNC therapy as compared to standard subnasal oxygen in the treatment of bronchiolitis.
The trial is registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12613000388718 (registered on 10 April 2013).
细支气管炎给全球非选择性儿科住院患者带来了最大的医疗负担,高达15%的病例需要入住重症监护病房。此前的多项研究未能显示药物治疗在缩短住院时间、降低儿科重症监护病房(PICU)入住率或插管频率方面的益处。在病情较轻的情况下早期使用无创呼吸支持设备以促进更早的呼吸支持,可能通过避免疾病进展而对治疗结果产生影响。高流量鼻导管(HFNC)疗法已成为一种新方法,可提供加湿气流以提供一种氧浓度可滴定的无创正压支持形式。目前缺乏关于HFNC疗法在细支气管炎治疗中应用的高级别证据。
方法/设计:一项前瞻性多中心随机试验,比较标准治疗(标准鼻下给氧)和高流量鼻导管疗法对澳大利亚和新西兰17家医院急诊科和病房收治的细支气管炎婴儿的疗效,其中包括12家非三级地区/城市医院和5家三级中心。主要结局是治疗失败;定义为符合预先设定的四项失败标准中的三项,需要升级治疗或提高护理级别;i)与入院/入组观察相比心率保持不变或增加,ii)与入院/入组观察相比呼吸频率保持不变或增加,iii)HFNC治疗组的氧需求超过FiO2≥40%以维持SpO2≥92%(或≥94%),或标准鼻下给氧治疗组的氧需求超过>2L/min以维持SpO2≥92%(或≥94%),以及iv)医院内部早期预警工具要求进行医疗评估并升级护理。次要结局包括转至三级医疗机构、入住重症监护病房、住院时间、氧疗时间、是否需要无创/有创通气、插管、不良事件和费用。
这项大型多中心随机试验将能够明确评估HFNC疗法与标准鼻下给氧相比在细支气管炎治疗中的疗效。
该试验已在澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心注册,注册号为ACTRN12613000388718(于2013年4月10日注册)。