[以欧洲一家大型中心为例，将治疗结果的系统分析作为质量控制工具]
[Systematic analysis of treatment results as a quality control instrument using the example of a large European center].
作者信息
Beyer B, Huland H, Graefen M
机构信息
Martini-Klinik am UKE GmbH, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
出版信息
Urologe A. 2015 Nov;54(11):1537-8, 1540-5. doi: 10.1007/s00120-015-3836-x.
BACKGROUND
Measurement of the quality of treatment has become increasingly important in hospitals. An easy and practical solution in data acquisition is the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement (PROM).
METHODS
In this article the historical development, general conditions, and difficulties of using the outcome measurement in our patients are describe. In addition, we illustrate the wide range of benefits due to our survey. Based on data from 2008-2013, the functional and oncological results of treatment in our clinic are shown. The main focus lies on the PROMs, e.g., urinary continence evaluated with the daily pad use, sexual function with the IIEF-5 questionnaire, and postoperative complications.
CONCLUSIONS
A systematic and standardized outcome measurement may help to improve the quality of treatment, provides factual information for patients, and supports medical development.
背景
治疗质量的评估在医院中变得越来越重要。患者报告结局测量（PROM）是一种在数据采集方面简便实用的解决方案。
方法
本文描述了结局测量在我们患者中的历史发展、一般情况和使用困难。此外，我们阐述了我们的调查所带来的广泛益处。基于2008年至2013年的数据，展示了我们诊所治疗的功能和肿瘤学结果。主要关注点在于患者报告结局测量，例如通过每日使用护垫评估尿失禁情况、使用IIEF - 5问卷评估性功能以及术后并发症。
结论
系统且标准化的结局测量可能有助于提高治疗质量，为患者提供实际信息，并支持医学发展。
Zotero 插件