van Zanten Malou, Piller Neil, Ward Leigh C
1 Lymphoedema Research Unit, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Flinders University , South Australia, Australia .
2 School Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland , Queensland, Australia .
Lymphat Res Biol. 2016 Jun;14(2):88-94. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2015.0026. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
Impedance technology is a popular technique for the early detection of lymphedema. The preferred approach is to use bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS), with measurements being made with the subject lying supine, although attempts have been made to use single or multiple frequency impedance measurements obtained while the subject is standing. The aim of the present study was to determine the equivalence of these different approaches. Impedance measurements of the individual limbs of 37 healthy individuals were determined using both a stand-on, multi-frequency impedance device and a supine impedance spectroscopy instrument. Significant differences were found between the instruments in both absolute impedance values and, importantly, inter-limb impedance ratios. Since impedance ratios in healthy individuals provide the reference standard for detection of lymphedema, these data indicate that the methods are not interchangeable. Consideration of the errors associated with each method indicates that the BIS remains the preferred method for lymphedema detection.
阻抗技术是一种用于早期检测淋巴水肿的常用技术。首选方法是使用生物电阻抗光谱法(BIS),测量时受试者需仰卧,不过也有人尝试在受试者站立时进行单频或多频阻抗测量。本研究的目的是确定这些不同方法的等效性。使用站立式多频阻抗设备和仰卧阻抗光谱仪对37名健康个体的各个肢体进行了阻抗测量。两种仪器在绝对阻抗值以及重要的肢体间阻抗比方面均存在显著差异。由于健康个体的阻抗比为淋巴水肿检测提供了参考标准,这些数据表明这些方法不可互换。对与每种方法相关的误差的考量表明,BIS仍然是淋巴水肿检测的首选方法。