Australian Lymphoedema Education, Research and Treatment Centre, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane, Australia.
Lymphat Res Biol. 2024 Feb;22(1):43-54. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2022.0108. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) measurements are conventionally performed in supine position with a lead device attached to gel-backed electrodes, and more recently, with a stand-on device that uses fixed stainless-steel electrodes under the hands and feet. The aim of this study was to assess and compare BIS measurements made in supine, sitting, and standing positions using lead and stand-on impedance devices in participants with and without unilateral leg lymphedema. Participants with self-ascribed unilateral leg lymphedema ( = 24) and healthy controls ( = 71) were recruited using a cross-sectional study design. Triplicate BIS measurements were taken for each device in each position. Impedance measurements with either device were reliable with coefficient of variation of 0.6% or lower. The magnitude of mean differences in absolute impedance values between devices were between 1% and 6% dependent on condition. L-Dex scores between the two devices were highly correlated ( = 0.82) and ∼70% of participants in the lymphedema group were classified as having lymphedema using the recommended cut-off with either device. There was no significant interleg difference of controls using the lead device; however, small, but significant differences ( = 0.0001) were found when using the stand-on device. The findings demonstrate that reliable impedance measurements of the legs can be made with either device in lying, sitting, or standing positions. However, data between the devices were not directly interchangeable. Although the risk of misidentification was small, reference ranges appropriate to the device and measurement position should be used when converting data to L-Dex scores.
生物阻抗谱(BIS)测量通常在仰卧位进行,使用连接到凝胶背电极的导联设备进行,最近,也使用站立式设备,在手和脚下方使用固定的不锈钢电极。本研究旨在评估和比较使用导联和站立式阻抗设备在单侧下肢淋巴水肿患者和健康对照者中仰卧位、坐位和站立位的 BIS 测量值。采用横断面研究设计,招募了自我报告的单侧下肢淋巴水肿患者(n=24)和健康对照者(n=71)。对每个位置的每个设备进行了三次 BIS 测量。两种设备的阻抗测量值均可靠,变异系数为 0.6%或更低。两种设备之间绝对阻抗值的平均差异的大小取决于条件,在 1%至 6%之间。两种设备之间的 L-Dex 评分高度相关(r=0.82),并且两种设备的建议截值将约 70%的淋巴水肿组患者分类为淋巴水肿。使用导联设备时,健康对照者的双腿之间没有明显的腿间差异;然而,当使用站立式设备时,发现了小但有统计学意义的差异(p=0.0001)。研究结果表明,无论是在卧位、坐位还是站立位,两种设备都可以可靠地测量腿部的阻抗。然而,两种设备之间的数据不能直接互换。尽管误识别的风险很小,但在将数据转换为 L-Dex 评分时,应使用适合设备和测量位置的参考范围。