• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头部创伤中未进行计算机断层扫描成像:相关判例法综述

Failure to Obtain Computed Tomography Imaging in Head Trauma: A Review of Relevant Case Law.

作者信息

Lindor Rachel A, Boie Eric T, Campbell Ronna L, Hess Erik P, Sadosty Annie T

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Dec;22(12):1493-8. doi: 10.1111/acem.12823. Epub 2015 Nov 17.

DOI:10.1111/acem.12823
PMID:26575581
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to describe lawsuits against providers for failing to order head computed tomography (CT) in cases of head trauma and to determine the potential effects of available clinical decision rules (CDRs) on each lawsuit.

METHODS

The authors collected jury verdicts, settlements, and court opinions regarding alleged malpractice for failure to order head CT in the setting of head trauma from 1972 through February 2014 from an online legal research tool (WestlawNext). Data were abstracted onto a standardized data form. The performance of five CDRs was evaluated.

RESULTS

Sixty relevant cases were identified (52 adult, eight children). Of 48 cases with known outcomes, providers were found negligent in 10 cases (six adult, four pediatric), settled in 11 cases (nine adult, two pediatric), and were found not liable in 27 cases. In all 10 cases in which providers were found negligent, every applicable CDR studied would have indicated the need for head CT. In all eight cases involving children, the applicable CDR would have suggested the need for head CT or observation.

CONCLUSIONS

A review of legal cases reported in a major online legal research system revealed 60 lawsuits in which providers were sued for failing to order head CTs in cases of head trauma. In all cases in which providers were found negligent, CT imaging or observation would have been indicated by every applicable CDR.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述针对头部创伤病例中未开具头部计算机断层扫描(CT)的医疗服务提供者的诉讼情况,并确定现有临床决策规则(CDR)对每起诉讼的潜在影响。

方法

作者从在线法律研究工具(WestlawNext)中收集了1972年至2014年2月期间关于头部创伤情况下未开具头部CT的医疗事故指控的陪审团裁决、和解协议和法院意见。数据被提取到标准化的数据表格中。对五个CDR的性能进行了评估。

结果

共识别出60例相关案例(52例成人,8例儿童)。在48例已知结果的案例中,医疗服务提供者在10例中被认定有过失(6例成人,4例儿童),11例达成和解(9例成人,2例儿童),27例被认定无责任。在所有10例医疗服务提供者被认定有过失的案例中,每一项适用的CDR都会表明需要进行头部CT检查。在所有8例涉及儿童的案例中,适用的CDR都会建议进行头部CT检查或观察。

结论

对一个主要在线法律研究系统中报告的法律案例进行回顾发现,有60起诉讼指控医疗服务提供者在头部创伤病例中未开具头部CT。在所有医疗服务提供者被认定有过失的案例中,每一项适用的CDR都会表明需要进行CT成像或观察。

相似文献

1
Failure to Obtain Computed Tomography Imaging in Head Trauma: A Review of Relevant Case Law.头部创伤中未进行计算机断层扫描成像:相关判例法综述
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Dec;22(12):1493-8. doi: 10.1111/acem.12823. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
2
Effect of clinical decision rules, patient cost and malpractice information on clinician brain CT image ordering: a randomized controlled trial.临床决策规则、患者费用和医疗事故信息对临床医生脑部 CT 图像检查申请的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Mar 12;18(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0602-1.
3
A survey of emergency physicians' fear of malpractice and its association with the decision to order computed tomography scans for children with minor head trauma.一项关于急诊医生对医疗事故的恐惧及其与为轻度头部创伤儿童开具计算机断层扫描(CT)决定之间关联的调查。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011 Mar;27(3):182-5. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31820d64f7.
4
Applicability of the CATCH, CHALICE and PECARN paediatric head injury clinical decision rules: pilot data from a single Australian centre.适用于 CATCH、CHALICE 和 PECARN 儿科头部损伤临床决策规则的研究:来自澳大利亚单一中心的初步数据。
Emerg Med J. 2013 Oct;30(10):790-4. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-201887. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
5
Triggers for head computed tomography following paediatric head injury: Comparison of physicians' reported practice and clinical decision rules.小儿颅脑损伤后行头部 CT 的触发因素:医生报告的实践与临床决策规则的比较。
Emerg Med Australas. 2013 Feb;25(1):75-82. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12019. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
6
Anaphylaxis-related Malpractice Lawsuits.过敏反应相关医疗事故诉讼
West J Emerg Med. 2018 Jul;19(4):693-700. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2018.4.37453. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
7
Reducing Head CT Use for Children With Head Injuries in a Community Emergency Department.减少社区急诊中儿童颅脑损伤的头部 CT 使用
Pediatrics. 2017 Apr;139(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-1349. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
8
Malpractice litigation after surgical injury of the spinal accessory nerve: an evidence-based analysis.副神经手术损伤后的医疗事故诉讼:基于证据的分析
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Jan;134(1):102-7. doi: 10.1001/archotol.134.1.102.
9
Comparing CATCH, CHALICE and PECARN clinical decision rules for paediatric head injuries.比较 CATCH、CHALICE 和 PECARN 临床决策规则在儿科头部损伤中的应用。
Emerg Med J. 2012 Oct;29(10):785-94. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2011-200225. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
10
Understanding Overuse of Computed Tomography for Minor Head Injury in the Emergency Department: A Triangulated Qualitative Study.理解急诊科对轻度头部损伤的计算机断层扫描过度使用情况:一项三角测量定性研究
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Dec;22(12):1474-83. doi: 10.1111/acem.12824. Epub 2015 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Rate of Intracranial Hemorrhage After Minor Head Injury.轻度头部损伤后颅内出血的发生率。
Cureus. 2020 Sep 25;12(9):e10653. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10653.
2
Effect of clinical decision rules, patient cost and malpractice information on clinician brain CT image ordering: a randomized controlled trial.临床决策规则、患者费用和医疗事故信息对临床医生脑部 CT 图像检查申请的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Mar 12;18(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0602-1.
3
Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Involving Surgical Residents.涉及外科住院医师的医疗事故诉讼
JAMA Surg. 2018 Jan 1;153(1):8-13. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.2979.