Haseltine Justin M, Rimner Andreas, Gelblum Daphna Y, Modh Ankit, Rosenzweig Kenneth E, Jackson Andrew, Yorke Ellen D, Wu Abraham J
Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2016 Mar-Apr;6(2):e27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2015.09.012. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is associated with excess toxicity following treatment of central lung tumors. Risk-adapted fractionation appears to have mitigated this risk, but it remains unclear whether SBRT is safe for all tumors within the central lung zone, especially those abutting the proximal bronchial tree (PBT). We investigated the dependence of toxicity on tumor proximity to PBT and whether tumors abutting the PBT had greater toxicity than other central lung tumors after SBRT.
A total of 108 patients receiving SBRT for central lung tumors were reviewed. Patients were classified based on closest distance from tumor to PBT. Primary endpoint was SBRT-related death. Secondary endpoints were overall survival, local control, and grade 3+ pulmonary adverse events. We compared tumors abutting the PBT to nonabutting and those ≤1 cm and >1 cm from PBT.
Median follow-up was 22.7 months. Median distance from tumor to PBT was 1.78 cm. Eighty-eight tumors were primary lung and 20 were recurrent or metastatic; 23% of tumors were adenocarcinoma and 71% squamous cell. Median age was 77.5 years. Median dose was 4500 cGy in 5 fractions prescribed to the 100% isodose line. Eighteen patients had tumors abutting the PBT, 4 of whom experienced SBRT-related death. No other patients experienced death attributed to SBRT. Risk of SBRT-related death was significantly higher for tumors abutting the PBT compared with nonabutting tumors (P < .001). Two patients with SBRT-related death received anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy and experienced pulmonary hemorrhage. Patients with tumors ≤1 cm from PBT had significantly more grade 3+ events than those with tumors >1cm from PBT (P = .014).
Even with risk-adapted fractionation, tumors abutting PBT are associated with a significant and differential risk of SBRT-related toxicity and death. SBRT should be used with particular caution in central-abutting tumors, especially in the context of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy.
立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)用于治疗中央型肺肿瘤时会伴随额外的毒性。风险适应性分割似乎已降低了这种风险,但SBRT对中央肺区的所有肿瘤是否安全仍不清楚,尤其是那些紧邻近端支气管树(PBT)的肿瘤。我们研究了毒性与肿瘤距PBT的距离之间的关系,以及SBRT后紧邻PBT的肿瘤是否比其他中央型肺肿瘤具有更高的毒性。
回顾了总共108例接受SBRT治疗中央型肺肿瘤的患者。根据肿瘤距PBT的最近距离对患者进行分类。主要终点是SBRT相关死亡。次要终点是总生存期、局部控制和3级及以上肺部不良事件。我们将紧邻PBT的肿瘤与不紧邻PBT的肿瘤以及距PBT≤1 cm和>1 cm的肿瘤进行了比较。
中位随访时间为22.7个月。肿瘤距PBT的中位距离为1.78 cm。88例肿瘤为原发性肺癌,20例为复发性或转移性肿瘤;23%的肿瘤为腺癌,71%为鳞状细胞癌。中位年龄为77.5岁。中位剂量为4500 cGy,分5次给予100%等剂量线。18例患者的肿瘤紧邻PBT,其中4例发生SBRT相关死亡。没有其他患者死于SBRT。与不紧邻PBT的肿瘤相比,紧邻PBT的肿瘤发生SBRT相关死亡的风险显著更高(P <.001)。2例发生SBRT相关死亡的患者接受了抗血管内皮生长因子治疗并发生了肺出血。距PBT≤1 cm的肿瘤患者发生3级及以上事件的比例显著高于距PBT>1 cm的肿瘤患者(P =.014)。
即使采用风险适应性分割,紧邻PBT的肿瘤与SBRT相关毒性和死亡的显著且不同的风险相关。在紧邻中央的肿瘤中,尤其是在抗血管内皮生长因子治疗的情况下,应特别谨慎地使用SBRT。