Song Si Yeol, Choi Wonsik, Shin Seong Soo, Lee Sang-Wook, Ahn Seung Do, Kim Jong Hoon, Je Hyoung Uk, Park Charn Il, Lee Jung Shin, Choi Eun Kyung
Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, 388-1 Pungnap2-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, Republic of Korea.
Lung Cancer. 2009 Oct;66(1):89-93. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.12.016. Epub 2009 Jan 24.
To assess the body-framed stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) results and toxicity for medically inoperable stage I lung cancer adjacent to central large bronchus and then compare the results with those of SBRT in peripheral lung tumor in the aspects of survival and SBRT-related pulmonary toxicities.
From June 1999 to May 2006, 32 patients diagnosed as stage I, T1N0 or T2N0, resectable NSCLC were treated with body-frame based fractionated SBRT. Thirty-one patients had several medical problems conflicting surgical procedure. Stereotactic body frame was used for improving setup accuracy. Doses of 10-20 Gy per fraction were delivered to the planning target volume (PTV) up to a total dose of 40-60 Gy with three to four fractions on consecutive days. Centrally located tumor was defined as the tumor within 2 cm apart from large bronchial tree, and was subdivided into bronchial (main/lobar bronchus) and peribronchial (segmental or distal).
Median follow-up was 26.5 months. The 6-month major response rate, including complete or partial response, was 53.1%. One patient showed progressive disease 1 month after SBRT. The 1- and 2-year actuarial local tumor control rates were both 85.3%. Overall survival was 70.9% at 1 year and 38.5% at 2 years, and survival was not correlated with SBRT dose. Of 9 patients with centrally located tumors, three (33%) experienced Grades 3-5 pulmonary toxicities. Eight patients showed partial or complete bronchial stricture and secondary loss of normal lung volume. Median time to bronchial stricture was 20.5 months. Overall survival did not differ by tumor location.
SBRT in this fractionation should not be given to central lung tumors because it can cause the late major airway toxicities in some patients. More protracted hypofractionated treatment regimen may be more safe than that used usually in SBRT for central lung tumors.
评估体部立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)对邻近中央大气管的医学上无法手术的I期肺癌的治疗效果及毒性反应,并在生存情况和SBRT相关肺部毒性方面将结果与外周肺肿瘤的SBRT结果进行比较。
1999年6月至2006年5月,32例被诊断为I期、T1N0或T2N0、可切除的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者接受了基于体部框架的分次SBRT治疗。31例患者存在一些与手术操作相冲突的医学问题。使用立体定向体部框架以提高摆位精度。每次向计划靶体积(PTV)给予10 - 20 Gy的剂量,连续3至4次,总剂量达40 - 60 Gy。中央型肿瘤定义为距大气道树2 cm以内的肿瘤,并细分为支气管型(主/叶支气管)和支气管周围型(段或远端)。
中位随访时间为26.5个月。6个月时的主要缓解率(包括完全缓解或部分缓解)为53.1%。1例患者在SBRT后1个月出现疾病进展。1年和2年的精算局部肿瘤控制率均为85.3%。1年总生存率为70.9%,2年为38.5%,且生存情况与SBRT剂量无关。9例中央型肿瘤患者中,3例(33%)出现3 - 5级肺部毒性反应。8例患者出现部分或完全支气管狭窄以及继发的正常肺容积丧失。支气管狭窄的中位时间为20.5个月。总生存情况在肿瘤部位之间无差异。
这种分割方式的SBRT不应应用于中央型肺肿瘤,因为它可能在一些患者中导致晚期大气道毒性反应。比通常用于中央型肺肿瘤SBRT的方案更延长的低分割治疗方案可能更安全。