Kim Jaeshin
a Dankook University.
J Soc Psychol. 2016 Sep-Oct;156(5):455-68. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2015.1119669. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
Both correlational and experimental studies examined how perceived emotional responses of the majority of Americans to 9/11 affect individuals' support for government counter-terrorism policies (i.e., military intervention, anti-immigration, restricting civil liberties). Study 1 found associations between perceived collective emotions (i.e., anger, fear) and individuals' own corresponding emotions and those between perceived collective anger and counter-terrorism policy support. Individuals' own anger mediated the associations of collective anger with policy support. Using experimental manipulations, Study 2 showed that collective anger had a significant effect on individuals' own anger and one significant and two marginal effects on counter-terrorism policy support. Individuals' own anger mediated one of the marginal effects of collective anger on policy support. Implications of these findings are discussed in the context of terrorist threat.
相关性研究和实验研究都考察了大多数美国人对9·11事件的感知情绪反应如何影响个人对政府反恐政策（即军事干预、反移民、限制公民自由）的支持。研究1发现，感知到的集体情绪（即愤怒、恐惧）与个人自身相应情绪之间存在关联，感知到的集体愤怒与反恐政策支持之间也存在关联。个人自身的愤怒在集体愤怒与政策支持的关联中起中介作用。通过实验操纵，研究2表明集体愤怒对个人自身的愤怒有显著影响，对反恐政策支持有一个显著影响和两个边缘影响。个人自身的愤怒在集体愤怒对政策支持的边缘影响中起中介作用之一。这些研究结果的意义在恐怖主义威胁的背景下进行了讨论。
