Rabenalt Robert, Winter Christian, Potthoff Sebastian A, Eisenberger Claus-Ferdinand, Grabitz Klaus, Albers Peter, Giessing Markus
Department of Urology, Heinrich Heine University Hospital Duesseldorf, Germany.
Department of Nephrology, Heinrich Heine University Hospital Duesseldorf, Germany.
Arab J Urol. 2011 Jun;9(2):93-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2011.06.014. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
Despite many efforts to prevent ureteric stenosis in a transplanted kidney, this complication occurs in 3-5% of renal transplant recipients. Balloon dilatation (BD) is a possible minimally invasive approach for treatment, but reports to date refer only to the antegrade approach; we analysed our experience with retrograde BD (RBD) and reviewed previous reports.
From October 2008 to February 2011, eight patients after renal transplantation (RTX) underwent RBD for transplant ureteric stenosis at our hospital. We retrospectively analysed the outcome and reviewed previous reports.
The eight recipients (five men and three women; median age 55 years, range 38-69) were treated with one or two RBDs for transplant ureteric stenosis. There were no complications. The median (range) time after RTX was 4.5 (2.5-11) months. Long-term success was only achieved in one recipient, while five patients were re-operated on (three with a new implant, two by replacement of transplanted ureter with ileum) after a median (range) of 2.8 (0.7-7.0) months after unsuccessful RBD(s). For two recipients the success remained unclear (one graft loss due to other reasons, one result pending). When the first RBD was unsuccessful there was no improvement with a second.
RBD is technically feasible, but our findings and the review of previous reports on antegrade ureteric dilatation suggest that the success rate is low when the ureter is dilated at ⩾10 weeks after RTX. From our results we cannot recommend RBD for transplant ureteric stenosis at ⩾10 weeks after RTX, while previous reports show favourable results of antegrade BD in the initial 3 months after RTX.
尽管为预防移植肾输尿管狭窄付出了诸多努力,但仍有3%至5%的肾移植受者会出现这一并发症。球囊扩张术(BD)是一种可能的微创治疗方法,但迄今为止的报告仅涉及顺行途径;我们分析了逆行球囊扩张术(RBD)的经验并回顾了既往报告。
2008年10月至2011年2月,我院8例肾移植(RTX)后患者因移植输尿管狭窄接受了RBD治疗。我们回顾性分析了结果并查阅了既往报告。
8例受者(5例男性和3例女性;中位年龄55岁,范围38至69岁)因移植输尿管狭窄接受了一或两次RBD治疗。无并发症发生。RTX后的中位(范围)时间为4.5(2.5至11)个月。仅1例受者获得长期成功,而5例患者在RBD失败后的中位(范围)2.8(0.7至7.0)个月后再次接受手术(3例植入新输尿管,2例用回肠替代移植输尿管)。2例受者的治疗效果尚不清楚(1例因其他原因移植肾丢失,1例结果待定)。首次RBD失败后,第二次RBD也未改善病情。
RBD在技术上是可行的,但我们的研究结果以及对既往顺行输尿管扩张术报告的回顾表明,RTX后≥10周进行输尿管扩张时成功率较低。根据我们的结果,对于RTX后≥10周的移植输尿管狭窄,我们不推荐使用RBD,而既往报告显示RTX后最初3个月内顺行BD效果良好。