Fiorentini Giovani, Carvalho Isabela P C, Messana Juliana D, Canesin Roberta C, Castagnino Pablo S, Lage Josiane F, Arcuri Pedro B, Berchielli Telma T
Embrapa, Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Gado de Leite, Juiz de Fora, MG 36038-330, Brazil.
Department of Animal Sciences, Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia-Ciência Animal, Universidade Federal deViçosa, Viçosa, MG 36570-000, Brazil.
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2015 Nov;28(11):1583-91. doi: 10.5713/ajas.15.0130.
The present study was conducted to determine the effect of lipid sources with different fatty acid profiles on nutrient digestion and ruminal fermentation. Ten rumen and duodenal fistulated Nellore steers (268 body weight±27 kg) were distributed in a duplicated 5×5 Latin square. Dietary treatments were as follows: without fat (WF), palm oil (PO), linseed oil (LO), protected fat (PF; Lactoplus), and whole soybeans (WS). The roughage feed was corn silage (600 g/kg on a dry matter [DM] basis) plus concentrate (400 g/kg on a DM basis). The higher intake of DM and organic matter (OM) (p<0.001) was found in animals on the diet with PF and WF (around 4.38 and 4.20 kg/d, respectively). Treatments with PO and LO decreased by around 10% the total digestibility of DM and OM (p<0.05). The addition of LO decreased by around 22.3% the neutral detergent fiber digestibility (p = 0.047) compared with other diets. The higher microbial protein synthesis was found in animals on the diet with LO and WS (33 g N/kg OM apparently digested in the rumen; p = 0.040). The highest C18:0 and linolenic acid intakes occurred in animals fed LO (p<0.001), and the highest intake of oleic (p = 0.002) and C16 acids (p = 0.022) occurred with the diets with LO and PF. Diet with PF decreased biohydrogenation extent (p = 0.05) of C18:1 n9,c, C18:2 n6,c, and total unsaturated fatty acids (UFA; around 20%, 7%, and 13%, respectively). The diet with PF and WF increased the concentration of NH3-N (p<0.001); however, the diet did not change volatile fatty acids (p>0.05), such as the molar percentage of acetate, propionate, butyrate and the acetate:propionate ratio. Treatments PO, LO and with WS decreased by around 50% the concentration of protozoa (p<0.001). Diets with some type of protection (PF and WS) decreased the effects of lipid on ruminal fermentation and presented similar outflow of benefit UFA as LO.
本研究旨在确定具有不同脂肪酸谱的脂质来源对营养物质消化和瘤胃发酵的影响。十头装有瘤胃和十二指肠瘘管的内洛尔阉牛(体重268±27千克)被分配到一个重复的5×5拉丁方设计中。日粮处理如下:无脂肪(WF)、棕榈油(PO)、亚麻籽油(LO)、保护脂肪(PF;Lactoplus)和全大豆(WS)。粗饲料为玉米青贮料(干物质[DM]基础上600克/千克)加精料(DM基础上400克/千克)。在饲喂PF和WF日粮的动物中发现干物质(DM)和有机物(OM)摄入量较高(p<0.001)(分别约为4.38和4.20千克/天)。PO和LO处理使DM和OM的总消化率降低了约10%(p<0.05)。与其他日粮相比,添加LO使中性洗涤纤维消化率降低了约22.3%(p = 0.047)。在饲喂LO和WS日粮的动物中发现微生物蛋白合成较高(瘤胃中表观消化的每千克OM中33克氮;p = 0.040)。饲喂LO的动物中C18:0和亚麻酸摄入量最高(p<0.001),而油酸(p = 0.002)和C16酸(p = 0.022)摄入量最高的是饲喂LO和PF日粮的动物。PF日粮降低了C18:1 n9,c、C18:2 n6,c和总不饱和脂肪酸(UFA)的生物氢化程度(p = 0.05)(分别约为20%、7%和13%)。PF和WF日粮增加了NH3-N的浓度(p<0.001);然而,日粮并未改变挥发性脂肪酸(p>0.05),如乙酸、丙酸、丁酸的摩尔百分比以及乙酸:丙酸比例。PO、LO和WS处理使原生动物浓度降低了约50%(p<0.001)。含有某种保护形式(PF和WS)的日粮降低了脂质对瘤胃发酵的影响,并呈现出与LO类似的有益UFA流出量。