Suppr超能文献

抗VEGF治疗过程中新型“SAVE”方案治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的评估

Evaluation of the New "SAVE" Protocol in Diabetic Macular Edema Over the Course of Anti-VEGF Treatment.

作者信息

Reznicek Lukas, Bolz Matthias, Garip Aylin, Kampik Anselm, Kernt Marcus, Mayer Wolfgang J

机构信息

a Department of Ophthalmology , Technical University Munich , Munich , Germany.

b Department of Ophthalmology , AKH Linz , Linz , Austria.

出版信息

Curr Eye Res. 2016 Aug;41(8):1082-1086. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2015.1084641. Epub 2015 Nov 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate a recently established grading protocol for diabetic macular edema (DME) over the course of intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment with ranibizumab.

METHODS

Fluorescein angiography images and optical coherence tomography scans before treatment and after 3 monthly applied intravitreal ranibizumab injections were retrospectively graded for each included study eye according to the recently introduced "SAVE" grading protocol ("S"= subretinal fluid; "A"= "area of retinal thickening"; "V"="vitreo-retinal abnormalities"; "E"="etiology of leakage focal versus non-focal") and correlated with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in letters (lett).

RESULTS

Five of the 39 included study eyes had subretinal fluid ("S") before treatment which resolved during treatment. BCVA of study eyes with an initial retinal thickening smaller than one disc diameter ("A") was non-significantly higher compared to patients with a retinal thickening greater than one disc diameter (34.0 ± 17.9 lett versus 25.3 ± 13.3 lett, p=0.236) but became significant during treatment (40.5 ± 10.0 lett versus 28.3 ± 13.1 lett, p=0.004). No difference in BCVA was observed between patients with or without vitreo-retinal abnormalities ("V") before and during therapy. BCVA in patients with focal leakage ("E") was significantly higher than in patients with non-focal leakage before (33.1 ± 12.3 lett versus 23.3 ± 13.3 lett, p=0.017) and during (38.9 ± 10.9 lett versus 26.3 ± 12.6 lett, p=0.002) therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Applying the grading protocol "SAVE", focal leakage ("E") was the only retrospectively observed parameter which significantly correlated with a better BCVA before therapy and over the course of treatment in patients with fovea-involving DME.

摘要

背景

评估在雷珠单抗玻璃体内抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)治疗过程中,一种最近建立的糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)分级方案。

方法

根据最近引入的“SAVE”分级方案(“S”=视网膜下液;“A”=视网膜增厚面积;“V”=玻璃体视网膜异常;“E”=渗漏灶性与非灶性病因),对纳入研究的每只眼治疗前及每月3次玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗后的荧光素血管造影图像和光学相干断层扫描进行回顾性分级,并与以字母表示的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)相关联。

结果

纳入研究的39只眼中,有5只在治疗前存在视网膜下液(“S”),治疗期间消失。初始视网膜增厚小于1个视盘直径(“A”)的研究眼的BCVA,与视网膜增厚大于1个视盘直径的患者相比,无显著差异(34.0±17.9字母与25.3±13.3字母,p = 0.236),但在治疗期间有显著差异(40.5±10.0字母与28.3±13.1字母,p = 0.004)。治疗前和治疗期间,有或无玻璃体视网膜异常(“V”)的患者之间,BCVA无差异。灶性渗漏(“E”)患者的BCVA在治疗前(33.1±12.3字母与23.3±13.3字母,p = 0.017)和治疗期间(38.9±10.9字母与26.3±12.6字母,p = 0.002)均显著高于非灶性渗漏患者。

结论

应用“SAVE”分级方案,灶性渗漏(“E”)是唯一一项回顾性观察到的参数,与累及黄斑中心凹的DME患者治疗前及治疗过程中较好的BCVA显著相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验