Suppr超能文献

使用点式混凝-絮凝-消毒法减少抗酸菌和非抗酸菌

Reduction of Acid-Fast and Non-Acid-Fast Bacteria by Point of Use Coagulation-Flocculation-Disinfection.

作者信息

Casanova Lisa M, Sobsey Mark D

机构信息

Division of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 3995 Atlanta, GA 30302, USA.

Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Rosenau Hall, Room 148, 135 Dauer Drive, Campus Box 7431, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Nov 13;12(11):14420-8. doi: 10.3390/ijerph121114420.

Abstract

Point of use (POU) household water treatment is increasingly being adopted as a solution for access to safe water. Non-tuberculous Mycobacteria (NTM) are found in water, but there is little research on whether NTM survive POU treatment. Mycobacteria may be removed by multi-barrier treatment systems that combine processes such as coagulation, settling and disinfection. This work evaluated removal of a non-tuberculous Mycobacterium (Mycobaterium terrae) and a Gram-negative non-acid-fast environmental bacterium (Aeromonas hydrophila) by combined coagulation-flocculation disinfection POU treatment. Aeromonas hydrophila showed 7.7 log10 reduction in demand free buffer, 6.8 log10 in natural surface water, and 4 log10 reduction in fecally contaminated surface water. Turbidity after treatment was <1 NTU. There was almost no reduction in levels of viable M. terrae by coagulant-flocculant-disinfectant in natural water after 30 minutes. The lack of Mycobacteria reduction was similar for both combined coagulant-flocculant-disinfectant and hypochlorite alone. A POU coagulant-flocculant-disinfectant treatment effectively reduced A. hydrophila from natural surface waters but not Mycobacteria. These results reinforce previous findings that POU coagulation-flocculation-disinfection is effective against gram-negative enteric bacteria. POU treatment and safe storage interventions may need to take into account risks from viable NTM in treated stored water and consider alternative treatment processes to achieve NTM reductions.

摘要

家庭终端(POU)水处理作为获取安全用水的一种解决方案正越来越多地被采用。水中会发现非结核分枝杆菌(NTM),但关于NTM在POU处理后能否存活的研究很少。分枝杆菌可能会被结合了混凝、沉淀和消毒等过程的多屏障处理系统去除。这项工作评估了通过混凝 - 絮凝 - 消毒POU联合处理对一种非结核分枝杆菌(地分枝杆菌)和一种革兰氏阴性非抗酸环境细菌(嗜水气单胞菌)的去除效果。嗜水气单胞菌在去离子缓冲液中减少了7.7个对数单位,在天然地表水中减少了6.8个对数单位,在粪便污染地表水中减少了4个对数单位。处理后的浊度<1 NTU。在天然水中,经过30分钟后,混凝剂 - 絮凝剂 - 消毒剂对存活的地分枝杆菌数量几乎没有减少。联合使用混凝剂 - 絮凝剂 - 消毒剂和单独使用次氯酸盐对分枝杆菌的减少效果都很差。POU混凝剂 - 絮凝剂 - 消毒剂处理能有效去除天然地表水中的嗜水气单胞菌,但不能去除分枝杆菌。这些结果强化了之前的发现,即POU混凝 - 絮凝 - 消毒对革兰氏阴性肠道细菌有效。POU处理和安全储存干预可能需要考虑处理后储存水中存活的NTM带来的风险,并考虑采用替代处理工艺来减少NTM。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc7a/4661657/a40e8b5932e2/ijerph-12-14420-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验