Wang Hongmei, Qiu Fang, Boilesen Eugene, Nayar Preethy, Lander Lina, Watkins Kate, Watanabe-Galloway Shinobu
Department of Health Services Research and Administration, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
J Rural Health. 2016 Sep;32(4):353-362. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12160. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
The objective of this study was to examine the rural-urban differences in Medicare expenditures on end-of-life care for elderly cancer patients in the United States.
We analyzed Medicare claims data for 175,181 elderly adults with lung, colorectal, female breast, or prostate cancer diagnosis who died in 2008. The end-of-life costs were quantified as total Medicare expenditures for the last 12 months of care including inpatient, outpatient, physician services, hospice, home health, skilled nursing facilities (SNF), and durable medical expenditure. Linear regression models were used to estimate rural-urban differences in log-transformed end-of-life costs and logistic regressions were used to estimate probability of service use, adjusting for demographics, socioeconomic status, and comorbidities.
On average, elderly cancer patients cost Medicare $51,273, $50,274, $62,815, and $50,941 in the last year for breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancer, respectively. Rural patients cost Medicare about 10%, 6%, 8%, and 4% less on end-of-life care than their urban counterparts for breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancer, respectively. Rural cancer patients were less likely to use hospice and home health, more likely to use outpatient and SNF, and they cost Medicare less on inpatient and physician services and more on outpatient care conditional on service use.
The lower Medicare spending on end-of-life care for the rural cancer patients suggests disparities based on place of residence. A future study that delineates the source of the rural-urban difference can help us understand whether it indicates inappropriate level of palliative care and find effective policies to reduce the urban-rural disparities.
本研究的目的是调查美国老年癌症患者临终关怀医疗保险支出的城乡差异。
我们分析了2008年死亡的175181名患有肺癌、结直肠癌、女性乳腺癌或前列腺癌诊断的老年成年人的医疗保险理赔数据。临终成本被量化为护理最后12个月的医疗保险总支出,包括住院、门诊、医生服务、临终关怀、家庭健康、熟练护理设施(SNF)和耐用医疗支出。线性回归模型用于估计对数转换后的临终成本的城乡差异,逻辑回归用于估计服务使用概率,并对人口统计学、社会经济地位和合并症进行调整。
平均而言,老年癌症患者在乳腺癌、前列腺癌、结直肠癌和肺癌的最后一年分别花费医疗保险51273美元、50274美元、62815美元和50941美元。农村患者在乳腺癌、前列腺癌、结直肠癌和肺癌的临终关怀方面分别比城市患者少花费约10%、6%、8%和4%。农村癌症患者使用临终关怀和家庭健康的可能性较小,使用门诊和SNF的可能性较大,并且在住院和医生服务方面花费医疗保险较少,而在服务使用条件下的门诊护理方面花费较多。
农村癌症患者临终关怀的医疗保险支出较低表明存在基于居住地的差异。一项未来研究,明确城乡差异的来源,可以帮助我们了解这是否表明姑息治疗水平不当,并找到减少城乡差异的有效政策。