Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
J Rural Health. 2019 Sep;35(4):528-539. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12351. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
Several studies have identified differences in end-of-life (EOL) care between urban and rural areas, yet little is known about potential differences in care processes or family evaluations of care. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between rurality of residence and quality of EOL care within the Veterans Affairs health care system.
This study was a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of 126,475 veterans who died from October 2009 through September 2016 in inpatient settings across 151 facilities. Using unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression, we compared quality of EOL care between urban and rural veterans using family evaluations of care and 4 quality of care indicators for receipt of (1) palliative care consult, (2) a chaplain visit, (3) death in an inpatient hospice unit, and (4) bereavement support.
Veterans from rural areas had lower odds of dying in an inpatient hospice unit compared to veterans from urban areas, before and after adjustment (large rural OR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.70-0.77; P < .001, small rural OR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.77-0.86; P < .001, isolated rural OR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.81-0.93; P < .001). Differences in comparisons of other quality of care indicators were small and of mixed significance. No significant differences were found in family ratings of care in fully adjusted models.
Receipt of some EOL quality indicators differed with urban-rural residence for some comparisons. However, family ratings of care did not. Our findings call for further investigation into unmeasured individual characteristics and facility processes related to rurality.
多项研究已经确定了城乡之间临终关怀(EOL)的差异,但对于护理过程或家庭对护理的评价方面的潜在差异知之甚少。本研究旨在检查退伍军人事务医疗保健系统中居住的农村地区与 EOL 护理质量之间的关系。
本研究是对 2009 年 10 月至 2016 年 9 月期间在 151 个设施中的住院环境中死亡的 126475 名退伍军人进行的回顾性、横断面分析。使用未经调整和调整后的逻辑回归,我们比较了农村和城市退伍军人之间的 EOL 护理质量,使用家庭对护理的评价以及接受 4 个护理质量指标的情况,分别是(1)姑息治疗咨询,(2)牧师探访,(3)在住院临终关怀病房死亡,以及(4)丧亲支持。
与城市退伍军人相比,农村地区退伍军人在住院临终关怀病房死亡的可能性较低,调整前后均如此(大农村 OR 0.73,95%CI:0.70-0.77;P<0.001,小农村 OR 0.81,95%CI:0.77-0.86;P<0.001,孤立农村 OR 0.87,95%CI:0.81-0.93;P<0.001)。其他护理质量指标的比较差异较小,且意义不一。在完全调整后的模型中,家庭对护理的评价没有差异。
对于某些比较,农村和城市居住地之间接受一些 EOL 质量指标有所不同。然而,家庭对护理的评价并没有。我们的发现呼吁进一步调查与农村地区相关的未测量的个体特征和设施流程。