Webster Lynn R, Brenner Darren M, Barrett Andrew C, Paterson Craig, Bortey Enoch, Forbes William P
PRA Health Sciences, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
J Pain Res. 2015 Oct 30;8:771-80. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S88203. eCollection 2015.
Subcutaneous methylnaltrexone is efficacious and well tolerated for opioid-induced constipation (OIC) but may theoretically disrupt opioid-mediated analgesia.
Opioid use, pain intensity, and opioid withdrawal (Objective Opioid Withdrawal Scale [OOWS] and Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scale [SOWS] scores) were reported in a randomized, double-blind trial with an open-label extension (RCT) and an open-label trial (OLT) evaluating safety in adults with chronic noncancer pain. In the RCT, patients taking ≥50 mg of oral morphine equivalents daily with <3 rescue-free bowel movements weekly received methyl naltrexone 12 mg once daily (n=150), every other day (n=148), or placebo (n=162) for 4 weeks, followed by open-label methylnaltrexone 12 mg (as needed [prn]; n=364) for 8 weeks. In the OLT, patients (n=1,034) on stable opioid doses with OIC received methylnaltrexone 12 mg prn for up to 48 weeks.
Minimal fluctuations of median morphine equivalent dose from baseline (BL) were observed in the RCT double-blind period (BL, 154.8-161.0 mg/d; range, 137.1-168.0 mg/d), RCT open-label period (BL, 156.3-174.6; range, 144.0-180.0) and OLT (BL, 120 mg/d; range, 117.3-121.1 mg/d). No significant change from BL in pain intensity score occurred in any group at weeks 2 or 4 (both P≥0.1) of the RCT double-blind period, and scores remained stable during the open-label period and in the OLT (mean change, -0.2 to 0.1). Changes from BL in OOWS and SOWS scores during the double-blind period were not significantly impacted by methylnaltrexone exposure at weeks 2 or 4 (P>0.05 for all).
Methylnaltrexone did not affect opioid-mediated analgesia in patients with chronic noncancer pain and OIC.
皮下注射甲基纳曲酮对阿片类药物引起的便秘(OIC)有效且耐受性良好,但理论上可能会干扰阿片类药物介导的镇痛作用。
在一项随机双盲试验(RCT)及一项开放标签试验(OLT)中报告了阿片类药物的使用情况、疼痛强度和阿片类药物戒断情况(客观阿片类药物戒断量表[OOWS]和主观阿片类药物戒断量表[SOWS]评分),这两项试验评估了慢性非癌性疼痛成人患者的安全性。在RCT中,每天服用≥50毫克口服吗啡当量且每周排便次数少于3次且无需急救的患者,接受甲基纳曲酮12毫克每日一次(n = 150)、隔日一次(n = 148)或安慰剂(n = 162)治疗4周,随后接受开放标签的甲基纳曲酮12毫克(按需[prn];n = 364)治疗8周。在OLT中,稳定服用阿片类药物且患有OIC的患者(n = 1,034)接受甲基纳曲酮12毫克prn治疗长达48周。
在RCT双盲期(基线[BL],154.8 - 161.0毫克/天;范围,137.1 - 168.0毫克/天)、RCT开放标签期(BL,156.3 - 174.6;范围,144.0 - 180.0)和OLT(BL,120毫克/天;范围,117.3 - 121.1毫克/天)中,观察到从基线开始的中位吗啡当量剂量波动极小。在RCT双盲期第2周或第4周时,任何组的疼痛强度评分与基线相比均无显著变化(P均≥0.1),且在开放标签期和OLT期间评分保持稳定(平均变化,-0.2至0.1)。在双盲期,OOWS和SOWS评分相对于基线的变化在第2周或第4周时未受到甲基纳曲酮暴露的显著影响(所有P>0.05)。
甲基纳曲酮对慢性非癌性疼痛和OIC患者的阿片类药物介导的镇痛作用无影响。