Undorf Monika, Böhm Simon, Cüpper Lutz
Department of Psychology.
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Jun;42(6):882-96. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000207. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
Current memory theories generally assume that memory performance reflects both recollection and automatic influences of memory. Research on people's predictions about the likelihood of remembering recently studied information on a memory test, that is, on judgments of learning (JOLs), suggests that both magnitude and resolution of JOLs are linked to recollection. However, it has remained unresolved whether JOLs are also predictive of automatic influences of memory. This issue was addressed in 3 experiments. Using the process-dissociation procedure, we assessed the predictive accuracy of immediate and delayed JOLs (Experiment 1) and of immediate JOLs from a first and from a second study-test cycle (Experiments 2 and 3) for recollection and automatic influences. Results showed that each type of JOLs was predictive of both recollection and automatic influences. Moreover, we found that a delay between study and JOL improved the predictive accuracy of JOLs for recollection, while study-test experience improved the predictive accuracy of JOLs for both recollection and automatic influences. These findings demonstrate that JOLs predict not only recollection, but also automatic influences of memory. (PsycINFO Database Record
当前的记忆理论通常假定,记忆表现既反映了记忆的回忆过程,也反映了记忆的自动影响。关于人们对在记忆测试中记住近期学习信息的可能性的预测研究,即对学习判断(JOLs)的研究表明,JOLs的大小和分辨率都与回忆相关。然而,JOLs是否也能预测记忆的自动影响这一问题仍未得到解决。在3个实验中探讨了这个问题。我们使用过程分离程序,评估了即时和延迟JOLs(实验1)以及来自第一个和第二个学习-测试周期的即时JOLs(实验2和3)对回忆和自动影响的预测准确性。结果表明,每种类型的JOLs都能预测回忆和自动影响。此外,我们发现学习与JOL之间的延迟提高了JOLs对回忆的预测准确性,而学习-测试经验提高了JOLs对回忆和自动影响的预测准确性。这些发现表明,JOLs不仅能预测回忆,还能预测记忆的自动影响。(PsycINFO数据库记录)