Chaili Siyang, Cheung Ambrose L, Bayer Arnold S, Xiong Yan Q, Waring Alan J, Memmi Guido, Donegan Niles, Yang Soo-Jin, Yeaman Michael R
Division of Molecular Medicine, Los Angeles County Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA Division of Infectious Diseases, Los Angeles County Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA.
Department of Microbiology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
Infect Immun. 2015 Nov 23;84(2):459-66. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01030-15. Print 2016 Feb.
Staphylococcus aureus uses the two-component regulatory system GraRS to sense and respond to host defense peptides (HDPs). However, the mechanistic impact of GraS or its extracellular sensing loop (EL) on HDP resistance is essentially unexplored. Strains with null mutations in the GraS holoprotein (ΔgraS) or its EL (ΔEL) were compared for mechanisms of resistance to HDPs of relevant immune sources: neutrophil α-defensin (human neutrophil peptide 1 [hNP-1]), cutaneous β-defensin (human β-defensin 2 [hBD-2]), or the platelet kinocidin congener RP-1. Actions studied by flow cytometry included energetics (ENR); membrane permeabilization (PRM); annexin V binding (ANX), and cell death protease activation (CDP). Assay conditions simulated bloodstream (pH 7.5) or phagolysosomal (pH 5.5) pH contexts. S. aureus strains were more susceptible to HDPs at pH 7.5 than at pH 5.5, and each HDP exerted a distinct effect signature. The impacts of ΔgraS and ΔΕL on HDP resistance were peptide and pH dependent. Both mutants exhibited defects in ANX response to hNP-1 or hBD-2 at pH 7.5, but only hNP-1 did so at pH 5.5. Both mutants exhibited hyper-PRM, -ANX, and -CDP responses to RP-1 at both pHs and hypo-ENR at pH 5.5. The actions correlated with ΔgraS or ΔΕL hypersusceptibility to hNP-1 or RP-1 (but not hBD-2) at pH 7.5 and to all study HDPs at pH 5.5. An exogenous EL mimic protected mutant strains from hNP-1 and hBD-2 but not RP-1, indicating that GraS and its EL play nonredundant roles in S. aureus survival responses to specific HDPs. These findings suggest that GraS mediates specific resistance countermeasures to HDPs in immune contexts that are highly relevant to S. aureus pathogenesis in humans.
金黄色葡萄球菌利用双组分调节系统GraRS来感知并响应宿主防御肽(HDP)。然而,GraS或其细胞外传感环(EL)对HDP抗性的机制影响基本上尚未得到探索。比较了GraS全蛋白(ΔgraS)或其EL(ΔEL)发生无效突变的菌株对相关免疫源HDP的抗性机制:中性粒细胞α-防御素(人中性粒细胞肽1 [hNP-1])、皮肤β-防御素(人β-防御素2 [hBD-2])或血小板激肽原同源物RP-1。通过流式细胞术研究的作用包括能量学(ENR);膜通透性(PRM);膜联蛋白V结合(ANX)和细胞死亡蛋白酶激活(CDP)。检测条件模拟了血流(pH 7.5)或吞噬溶酶体(pH 5.5)的pH环境。金黄色葡萄球菌菌株在pH 7.5时比在pH 5.5时对HDP更敏感,并且每种HDP都表现出独特的效应特征。ΔgraS和ΔΕL对HDP抗性的影响取决于肽和pH。两种突变体在pH 7.5时对hNP-1或hBD-2的ANX反应均表现出缺陷,但仅hNP-1在pH 5.5时如此。两种突变体在两个pH值下对RP-1均表现出高PRM、高ANX和高CDP反应,在pH 5.5时表现出低ENR。这些作用与ΔgraS或ΔΕL在pH 7.5时对hNP-1或RP-1(但不是hBD-2)以及在pH 5.5时对所有研究的HDP的超敏感性相关。一种外源性EL模拟物可保护突变菌株免受hNP-1和hBD-2的影响,但不能保护其免受RP-1的影响,这表明GraS及其EL在金黄色葡萄球菌对特定HDP的存活反应中发挥非冗余作用。这些发现表明,GraS在与人类金黄色葡萄球菌发病机制高度相关的免疫环境中介导对HDP的特异性抗性对策。