Tedeschi Luis O
Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 24;10(11):e0143483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143483. eCollection 2015.
Cattle body composition is difficult to model because several factors affect the composition of the average daily gain (ADG) of growing animals. The objective of this study was to identify commercial single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panels that could improve the predictability of days on feed (DOF) to reach a target United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) grade given animal, diet, and environmental information under feedyard conditions. The data for this study was comprised of crossbred heifers (n = 681) and steers (n = 836) from commercial feedyards. Eleven molecular breeding value (MBV) scores derived from SNP panels of candidate gene polymorphisms and two-leptin gene SNP (UASMS2 and E2FB) were evaluated. The empty body fat (EBF) and the shrunk body weight (SBW) at 28% EBF (AFSBW) were computed by the Cattle Value Discovery System (CVDS) model using hip height (EBFHH and AFSBWHH) or carcass traits (EBFCT and AFSBWCT) of the animals. The DOFHH was calculated when AFSBWHH and ADGHH were used and DOFCT was calculated when AFSBWCT and ADGCT were used. The CVDS estimates dry matter required (DMR) by individuals fed in groups when observed ADG and AFSBW are provided. The AFSBWCT was assumed more accurate than the AFSBWHH because it was computed using carcass traits. The difference between AFSBWCT and AFSBWHH, DOFCT and DOFHH, and DMR and dry matter intake (DMI) were regressed on the MBV scores and leptin gene SNP to explain the variation. Our results indicate quite a large range of correlations among MBV scores and model input and output variables, but MBV ribeye area was the most strongly correlated with the differences in DOF, AFSBW, and DMI by explaining 8, 13.2 and 6.5%, respectively, of the variation. This suggests that specific MBV scores might explain additional variation of input and output variables used by nutritional models in predicting individual animal performance.
牛的身体组成很难建模,因为有几个因素会影响生长动物平均日增重(ADG)的组成。本研究的目的是确定商业单核苷酸多态性(SNP)面板,这些面板可以在饲养场条件下,根据动物、日粮和环境信息,提高达到美国农业部(USDA)目标等级所需的饲养天数(DOF)的预测能力。本研究的数据包括来自商业饲养场的杂交小母牛(n = 681)和阉牛(n = 836)。对从候选基因多态性的SNP面板和两个瘦素基因SNP(UASMS2和E2FB)得出的11个分子育种值(MBV)分数进行了评估。空体脂肪(EBF)和28% EBF时的缩体重(SBW)(AFSBW)通过牛价值发现系统(CVDS)模型,使用动物的髋高(EBFHH和AFSBWHH)或胴体性状(EBFCT和AFSBWCT)来计算。当使用AFSBWHH和ADGHH时计算DOFHH,当使用AFSBWCT和ADGCT时计算DOFCT。当提供观察到的ADG和AFSBW时,CVDS估计成组饲养个体所需的干物质(DMR)。由于AFSBWCT是使用胴体性状计算的,因此假定其比AFSBWHH更准确。将AFSBWCT与AFSBWHH、DOFCT与DOFHH以及DMR与干物质摄入量(DMI)之间的差异对MBV分数和瘦素基因SNP进行回归,以解释变异情况。我们的结果表明,MBV分数与模型输入和输出变量之间存在相当大的相关性范围,但MBV眼肌面积与DOF、AFSBW和DMI差异的相关性最强,分别解释了8%、13.2%和6.5%的变异。这表明特定的MBV分数可能解释营养模型在预测个体动物性能时所使用的输入和输出变量的额外变异。