Dawson Kate, McLachlan Helen, Newton Michelle, Forster Della
School of Nursing and Midwifery La Trobe University, Bundoora 3086, Australia; Judith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, 215 Franklin St, Melbourne 3000, Australia.
School of Nursing and Midwifery La Trobe University, Bundoora 3086, Australia; Judith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, 215 Franklin St, Melbourne 3000, Australia.
Women Birth. 2016 Jun;29(3):214-22. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.10.010. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
The benefits of caseload midwifery care are clearly documented, and many policy documents in Australia support its expansion. Despite this, little is known about the availability of caseload across Australia, nor about what proportion of women have access to a caseload model. This paper describes caseload midwifery in the public maternity system in Australia; its prevalence, and factors associated with implementation and sustainability.
A cross-sectional online survey of maternity managers of public hospitals that provide birthing services throughout Australia.
Sixty-three percent (149/235) of eligible participants responded. Respondents were from all states and territories, metropolitan, regional and remote areas, and from hospitals with very small to very large birth numbers. Only 31% reported that their hospital offers caseload midwifery, and an estimated eight percent of women received caseload care at the time of the survey, most of whom were considered to be of 'low obstetric risk'. Many respondents were planning to implement or expand caseload. Key factors associated with the implementation of caseload were funding to establish the model, the interest and availability of staff to work in the model, organisational support and perceived consumer demand.
This is the first study to explore caseload implementation at a national level. Although the number of services offering caseload midwifery care has increased nationally, access remains relatively limited. Women who live in metropolitan areas and who are considered at 'low obstetric risk' are most likely to be able to access this model. Funding and support for establishing new models are the main barriers to implementation.
个案管理助产护理的益处已有明确记录,澳大利亚的许多政策文件都支持扩大其覆盖范围。尽管如此,对于澳大利亚各地个案管理的可及性,以及有多少比例的女性能够获得个案管理模式,人们知之甚少。本文描述了澳大利亚公共产科系统中的个案管理助产护理;其普及程度,以及与实施和可持续性相关的因素。
对澳大利亚各地提供分娩服务的公立医院的产科管理人员进行横断面在线调查。
63%(149/235)符合条件的参与者进行了回应。受访者来自所有州和领地,包括大都市、地区和偏远地区,以及分娩数量从极少到极多的医院。只有31%的人报告称他们的医院提供个案管理助产护理,据估计在调查时约有8%的女性接受了个案管理护理,其中大多数被认为是“低产科风险”。许多受访者计划实施或扩大个案管理。与个案管理实施相关的关键因素包括建立该模式的资金、工作人员参与该模式工作的兴趣和可及性、组织支持以及感知到的消费者需求。
这是第一项在国家层面探索个案管理实施情况的研究。尽管全国范围内提供个案管理助产护理的服务数量有所增加,但可及性仍然相对有限。居住在大都市地区且被认为是“低产科风险”的女性最有可能获得这种模式。建立新模式的资金和支持是实施的主要障碍。