Shakya Vijay Kumar, Singh Rajeev Kumar, Pathak Anjani Kumar, Singh Balendra Pratap, Chandra Anil, Bharti Ramesh, Yadav Rakesh Kumar
Assistant Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India.
Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatric & Preventive Dentistry, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India.
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2015 Sep-Dec;5(3):185-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2015.07.006. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
Success or failure of a composite restoration largely depends on its bonding to enamel/dentine. Several better adhesive systems have been developed during the last few years due to rapid advancement in the technology. Recent self-etched adhesives have fewer clinical steps and are less technique sensitive.
Ninety extracted human permanent molars were collected, grounded and finished to prepare flat dentine-bonding surfaces on their occlusal surface. All specimens were divided into three groups (n = 30) on the basis of three adhesive systems Adper Easy Bond (AE), Beautibond (BB) and Xeno IV (XE). These adhesive systems were applied on prepared mid-dentine-bonding surface. A restorative resin was added with the help of a transparent tube of 2 mm height and 1.7 mm internal diameter and cured. Fifteen specimens in each group were loaded to failure in an Instron Universal Testing Machine after storage for 24 h at 37 °C to check micro-shear bond strength. Another fifteen specimens from each group were thermocycled 500 times at 5 °C and 55 °C with dwell time of 1 min in each bath followed by loading to failure. The data obtained was analyzed with SPSS version 21 at significance level of <05.
After 24 h, micro-shear bond strength of BB was higher (26.04 MPa) than XE (23.69 MPa) and AE (21.50 MPa). After thermocycling, micro-shear bond strength decreased significantly in BB (P = .001) and XE (P = .03).
The micro-shear bond strength of BB was highest among three groups, which decreased after thermocycling.
复合树脂修复体的成败很大程度上取决于其与牙釉质/牙本质的粘结。由于技术的快速发展,在过去几年中已经开发出了几种更好的粘结系统。最近的自酸蚀粘结剂临床步骤更少,对技术的敏感性更低。
收集90颗拔除的人恒牙磨牙,进行打磨和修整,在其咬合面制备平坦的牙本质粘结表面。根据三种粘结系统Adper Easy Bond(AE)、Beautibond(BB)和Xeno IV(XE)将所有标本分为三组(n = 30)。将这些粘结系统应用于制备好的牙本质粘结表面中部。借助一个高度为2毫米、内径为1.7毫米的透明管添加修复树脂并固化。每组中的15个标本在37°C下储存24小时后,在Instron万能试验机上加载至破坏,以检查微剪切粘结强度。每组中的另外15个标本在5°C和55°C下进行500次热循环,每个水浴中的停留时间为1分钟,然后加载至破坏。使用SPSS 21版对获得的数据进行分析,显著性水平<0.05。
24小时后,BB的微剪切粘结强度(26.04MPa)高于XE(23.69MPa)和AE(21.50MPa)。热循环后,BB(P = 0.001)和XE(P = 0.03)的微剪切粘结强度显著降低。
BB的微剪切粘结强度在三组中最高,热循环后降低。