Sawe Hendry Robert, Mfinanga Juma A, Mwafongo Victor, Reynolds Teri A, Runyon Michael S
Emergency Medicine Department, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Emergency Medicine Department, Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Emergency Medicine Department, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Department of Emergency Medicine and Global Health Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Emerg Med J. 2016 May;33(5):338-44. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2015-204908. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
To evaluate the test characteristics of clinical gestalt for detecting the presence and severity of anaemia in emergency department patients at a tertiary referral hospital in Tanzania.
This prospective study enrolled a convenience sample of emergency department patients who had a complete blood count ordered by the treating physician in the course of their clinical care. Physicians recorded their impression of the presence and severity of anaemia before viewing the laboratory results. To assess interobserver agreement, a second physician provided their blinded gestalt impression of the patient's haemoglobin level.
We enrolled 216 patients and complete data were available for 210 patients (97%), 59% male, median age 30 years. The range of measured haemoglobin values was 1.5-15.4 g/dL. The physicians rated anaemia mild or absent in 74 (35%), moderate in 72 (34%) and severe in 64 patients (30%). These estimates were significantly concordant with the laboratory haemoglobin measurements (Kendall's τ b=0.63, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.69, p<0.0001). The test characteristics of physician gestalt estimates for severe anaemia were: sensitivity 64% (95% CI 53% to 74%), specificity 91% (95% CI 85% to 96%), positive likelihood ratio of 7.4 (95% CI 4.2 to 13.3) and negative likelihood ratio of 0.40 (0.3 to 0.5). The weighted Cohen's κ for interobserver agreement between physicians on the gestalt estimate of the degree of anaemia was 0.87 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.98).
Physicians' estimates of the severity of anaemia were significantly concordant with laboratory haemoglobin measurements. Sensitivity of the gestalt estimate for severe anaemia was moderate. Interobserver agreement was 'almost perfect'.
评估临床整体判断在坦桑尼亚一家三级转诊医院急诊科患者中检测贫血存在情况及严重程度的测试特征。
这项前瞻性研究纳入了一个便利样本,即急诊科患者,这些患者在临床护理过程中由主治医生开具了全血细胞计数检查。医生在查看实验室结果之前记录他们对贫血存在情况及严重程度的判断。为评估观察者间的一致性,另一位医生对患者的血红蛋白水平给出了盲法整体判断。
我们纳入了216例患者,210例患者(97%)有完整数据,男性占59%,中位年龄30岁。测得的血红蛋白值范围为1.5 - 15.4 g/dL。医生将74例患者(35%)的贫血评定为轻度或无贫血,72例患者(34%)为中度贫血,64例患者(30%)为重度贫血。这些评估与实验室血红蛋白测量结果显著一致(肯德尔τ系数b = 0.63,95%置信区间0.57至0.69,p < 0.0001)。医生对重度贫血的整体判断的测试特征为:敏感性64%(95%置信区间53%至74%),特异性91%(95%置信区间85%至96%),阳性似然比7.4(95%置信区间4.2至13.3),阴性似然比0.40(0.3至0.5)。医生之间在贫血程度整体判断上的加权科恩κ系数为0.87(95%置信区间0.76至0.98)。
医生对贫血严重程度的评估与实验室血红蛋白测量结果显著一致。对重度贫血的整体判断敏感性中等。观察者间的一致性“几乎完美”。