• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对退伍军人伴侣暴力问题的居家男性力量项目的随机对照临床试验。

A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of the Strength at Home Men's Program for Partner Violence in Military Veterans.

作者信息

Taft Casey T, Macdonald Alexandra, Creech Suzannah K, Monson Candice M, Murphy Christopher M

机构信息

VA Boston Healthcare System (116B-4), 150 South Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02130.

National Center for PTSD, VA Boston Healthcare System, and Department of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2016 Sep;77(9):1168-1175. doi: 10.4088/JCP.15m10020.

DOI:10.4088/JCP.15m10020
PMID:26613288
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the efficacy of the Strength at Home Men's Program (SAH-M), a trauma-informed group intervention based on a social information processing model to end intimate partner violence (IPV) use in a sample of veterans/service members and their partners. To date, no randomized controlled trial has supported the efficacy of an IPV intervention in this population.

METHOD

Participants included 135 male veterans/service members and 111 female partners. Recruitment was conducted from February 2010 through August 2013, and participation occurred within 2 Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals. Male participants completed an initial assessment that included diagnostic interviews and measures of physical and psychological IPV using the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales and were randomly assigned to an enhanced treatment as usual (ETAU) condition or SAH-M. Those randomized to SAH-M were enrolled in this 12-week group immediately after baseline. Those randomized to ETAU received clinical referrals and resources for mental health treatment and IPV services. All male participants were reassessed 3 and 6 months after baseline. Female partners completed phone assessments at the same intervals that were focused both on IPV and on the provision of safety information and clinical referrals.

RESULTS

Primary analyses using hierarchical linear modeling indicated significant time-by-condition effects such that SAH-M participants compared with ETAU participants evidenced greater reductions in physical and psychological IPV use (β = -0.135 [SE = 0.061], P = .029; β = -0.304 [SE = 0.135], P = .026; respectively). Additional analyses of a measure that disaggregated forms of psychological IPV showed that SAH-M, relative to ETAU, reduced controlling behaviors involving isolation and monitoring of the partner (β = -0.072 [SE = 0.027], P = .010).

CONCLUSIONS

Results provide support for the efficacy of SAH-M in reducing and ending IPV in male veterans and service members.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01435512.

摘要

目的

我们评估了居家力量男性项目(SAH-M)的疗效,该项目是一种基于社会信息处理模型的创伤知情团体干预措施,旨在终止退伍军人/现役军人及其伴侣中的亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)行为。迄今为止,尚无随机对照试验支持针对该人群的IPV干预措施的疗效。

方法

参与者包括135名男性退伍军人/现役军人和111名女性伴侣。招募工作于2010年2月至2013年8月进行,参与在2家退伍军人事务部医院内开展。男性参与者完成了初始评估,包括诊断访谈以及使用修订版冲突策略量表对身体和心理IPV的测量,并被随机分配到强化常规治疗(ETAU)组或SAH-M组。随机分配到SAH-M组的参与者在基线后立即参加这个为期12周的团体项目。随机分配到ETAU组的参与者获得了心理健康治疗和IPV服务的临床转诊及资源。所有男性参与者在基线后3个月和6个月接受重新评估。女性伴侣在相同时间间隔完成电话评估,评估重点是IPV以及安全信息的提供和临床转诊。

结果

使用分层线性模型的主要分析表明存在显著的时间×条件效应,因此与ETAU组参与者相比,SAH-M组参与者在身体和心理IPV行为方面的减少更为显著(β = -0.135 [标准误 = 0.061],P = 0.029;β = -0.304 [标准误 = 0.135],P = 0.026)。对一项分解心理IPV形式的测量指标进行的额外分析表明,与ETAU组相比,SAH-M组减少了涉及隔离和监视伴侣的控制行为(β = -0.072 [标准误 = 0.027],P = 0.010)。

结论

结果为SAH-M在减少和终止男性退伍军人及现役军人中的IPV行为方面的疗效提供了支持。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT01435512。

相似文献

1
A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of the Strength at Home Men's Program for Partner Violence in Military Veterans.一项针对退伍军人伴侣暴力问题的居家男性力量项目的随机对照临床试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2016 Sep;77(9):1168-1175. doi: 10.4088/JCP.15m10020.
2
Strength at Home Couples program to prevent military partner violence: A randomized controlled trial.“家庭力量”项目预防军人伴侣暴力:一项随机对照试验
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 Nov;84(11):935-945. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000129. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
3
Optimizing trauma-informed intervention for intimate partner violence in veterans: The role of alexithymia.优化创伤知情干预在退伍军人亲密伴侣暴力中的应用:述情障碍的作用。
Behav Res Ther. 2017 Oct;97:222-229. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2017.08.007. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
4
National implementation of a trauma-informed intervention for intimate partner violence in the Department of Veterans Affairs: first year outcomes.美国退伍军人事务部在全国范围内实施针对亲密伴侣暴力的创伤知情干预措施:第一年的成果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 24;18(1):582. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3401-6.
5
PTSD symptoms predict outcome in trauma-informed treatment of intimate partner aggression.创伤后应激障碍症状可预测亲密伴侣攻击行为的创伤知情治疗效果。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 Oct;85(10):966-974. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000228. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
6
Examining strength at home couples to prevent intimate partner violence on a military installation: A randomized controlled trial.在军事设施上检查家庭伴侣的力量以预防亲密伴侣暴力:一项随机对照试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2024 Apr;92(4):202-212. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000863. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
7
Evaluation of the Strength at Home Group Intervention for Intimate Partner Violence in the Veterans Affairs Health System.家庭强化组干预对退伍军人事务部卫生系统中亲密伴侣暴力的效果评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e232997. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.2997.
8
"Strength at Home" Intervention for Male Veterans Perpetrating Intimate Partner Aggression: Perceived Needs Survey of Therapists and Pilot Effectiveness Study.针对实施亲密伴侣攻击行为的男性退伍军人的“家庭力量”干预措施:治疗师的需求感知调查及试点有效性研究
J Interpers Violence. 2015 Aug;30(13):2344-62. doi: 10.1177/0886260514552445. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
9
Effect of Addition of an Intimate Partner Violence Intervention to a Nurse Home Visitation Program on Maternal Quality of Life: A Randomized Clinical Trial.护士家访项目中增加亲密伴侣暴力干预对产妇生活质量的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Apr 23;321(16):1576-1585. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.3211.
10
Ecological pathways to prevention: How does the SASA! community mobilisation model work to prevent physical intimate partner violence against women?预防的生态途径:“SASA!”社区动员模式如何预防针对妇女的亲密伴侣身体暴力?
BMC Public Health. 2016 Apr 16;16:339. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3018-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Childhood Histories of Family Violence and Adult Intimate Partner Violence Use Among U.S. Military Veterans.美国退伍军人的童年家庭暴力经历与成年亲密伴侣暴力行为
Psychol Violence. 2024;15(2):214-223. doi: 10.1037/vio0000555.
2
The Impact of Trauma and Substance Use on Emotion Regulation and Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration: Implications for Perpetrator Programs.创伤与物质使用对情绪调节及亲密伴侣暴力犯罪的影响:对犯罪者项目的启示
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Feb 1;15(2):156. doi: 10.3390/bs15020156.
3
Randomised pilot and feasibility trial of a group intervention for men who perpetrate intimate partner violence against women.
针对对女性实施亲密伴侣暴力行为的男性的小组干预随机试点与可行性试验。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 27;24(1):1183. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18640-5.
4
Examining the role of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in intimate partner violence among couples with alcohol use disorder.探讨创伤后应激障碍症状在酒精使用障碍患者伴侣间亲密关系暴力中的作用。
Aggress Behav. 2024 Mar;50(2):e22137. doi: 10.1002/ab.22137.
5
Predictors of veteran attendance in an intimate partner violence intervention.预测老兵参加亲密伴侣暴力干预的因素。
J Fam Psychol. 2024 Apr;38(3):443-452. doi: 10.1037/fam0001200. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
6
Trauma-informed parenting intervention for veterans: A preliminary uncontrolled trial of Strength at Home-Parents.创伤知情养育干预退伍军人:家庭力量-父母的初步非对照试验。
J Fam Psychol. 2023 Dec;37(8):1294-1302. doi: 10.1037/fam0001131. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
7
Methodological Challenges in Group-based Randomised Controlled Trials for Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators: A Meta-summary.针对亲密伴侣暴力施暴者的群组随机对照试验中的方法学挑战:一项元综述
Psychosoc Interv. 2023 May 26;32(2):123-136. doi: 10.5093/pi2023a9. eCollection 2023 May.
8
Characterizing Disparities in the Treatment of Intimate Partner Violence.刻画亲密伴侣暴力治疗中的差异
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2023 Jun 16;2023:408-417. eCollection 2023.
9
Childhood Maltreatment and Use of Aggression among Veterans with Co-occurring PTSD and Alcohol Use Disorder: The Mediating Role of Hostile Cognitions.同时患有创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和酒精使用障碍的退伍军人中的童年虐待与攻击行为的使用:敌意认知的中介作用
J Aggress Maltreat Trauma. 2023;32(4):574-591. doi: 10.1080/10926771.2022.2151961. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
10
Evaluation of the Strength at Home Group Intervention for Intimate Partner Violence in the Veterans Affairs Health System.家庭强化组干预对退伍军人事务部卫生系统中亲密伴侣暴力的效果评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e232997. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.2997.