Smith Miriam J, Urquhart Jill E, Harkness Elaine F, Miles Emma K, Bowers Naomi L, Byers Helen J, Bulman Michael, Gokhale Carolyn, Wallace Andrew J, Newman William G, Evans D Gareth
Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre (MAHSC), University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
Centre for Imaging Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PY, UK.
Hum Mutat. 2016 Mar;37(3):250-6. doi: 10.1002/humu.22938. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
Heterozygous whole gene deletions (WGDs), and intragenic microdeletions, account for a significant proportion of mutations underlying cancer predisposition syndromes. We analyzed the frequency and genotype-phenotype correlations of microdeletions in 12 genes (BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53, MSH2, MLH1, MSH6, PMS2, NF1, NF2, APC, PTCH1, and VHL) representing seven tumor predisposition syndromes in 5,897 individuals (2,611 families) from our center. Overall, microdeletions accounted for 14% of identified mutations. As expected, smaller deletions or duplications were more common (12%) than WGDs (2.2%). Where a WGD was identified in the germline in NF2, the mechanism of somatic second hit was not deletion, as previously described for NF1. For neurofibromatosis type 1 and 2, we compared the mechanism of germline deletion. Unlike NF1, where three specific deletion sizes account for most germline WGDs, NF2 deletion breakpoints were different across seven samples tested. One of these deletions was 3.93 Mb and conferred a severe phenotype, thus refining the region for a potential NF2 modifier gene to a 2.04-Mb region on chromosome 22. The milder phenotype of NF2 WGDs may be due to the apparent absence of chromosome 22 loss as the second hit. These observations of WGD phenotypes will be helpful for interpreting incidental findings from microarray analysis and next-generation sequencing.
杂合性全基因缺失(WGDs)和基因内微缺失,在癌症易感综合征相关的突变中占相当大的比例。我们分析了来自本中心的5897名个体(2611个家系)中,代表七种肿瘤易感综合征的12个基因(BRCA1、BRCA2、TP53、MSH2、MLH1、MSH6、PMS2、NF1、NF2、APC、PTCH1和VHL)中微缺失的频率及基因型-表型相关性。总体而言,微缺失占已鉴定突变的14%。正如预期的那样,较小的缺失或重复(12%)比WGDs(2.2%)更常见。在NF2的种系中鉴定出WGD时,体细胞二次打击的机制并非缺失,这与之前报道的NF1情况不同。对于1型和2型神经纤维瘤病,我们比较了种系缺失的机制。与NF1不同,NF1中三种特定的缺失大小占了大多数种系WGDs,而在测试的七个NF2样本中,缺失断点各不相同。其中一个缺失为3.93 Mb,导致严重表型,从而将潜在的NF2修饰基因区域细化到22号染色体上一个2.04-Mb的区域。NF2 WGDs较轻的表型可能是由于二次打击时明显不存在22号染色体缺失。这些关于WGD表型的观察结果,将有助于解释微阵列分析和下一代测序中的偶然发现。