Hahn David
Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois.
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2015 Dec;32(4):379-83. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1564812.
Over the past decade, there has been a gradual evolution of the retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filter, as the indications for caval filtration have expanded since the first such filters came into use. However, the particular design of retrievable or optional filters has introduced a subset of both symptomatic and asymptomatic device failures that have prompted a reassessment in the approach to patient selection as well as a new lexicon of technical considerations when considering retrieval. The Denali Vena Cava Filter (Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc., Tempe, AZ) represents one of the latest filters to come to market that specifically addresses the various issues of its predecessors. While the body of published experience with this filter is still relatively sparse, the incidence of filter tilt, strut perforation, strut fracture, and filter migration appears acceptably low and the filters remain relatively easy to retrieve even after long dwell times.
在过去十年中,可回收下腔静脉(IVC)滤器逐渐发展,自首批此类滤器投入使用以来,腔静脉滤过的适应证不断扩大。然而,可回收或选择性滤器的特殊设计引发了一系列有症状和无症状的器械故障,这促使人们重新评估患者选择方法,并在考虑取出滤器时产生了一套新的技术考量术语。德纳利腔静脉滤器(巴德外周血管公司,亚利桑那州坦佩)是最新上市的滤器之一,专门解决了其前代产品的各种问题。虽然关于这种滤器的已发表经验仍相对较少,但滤器倾斜、支柱穿孔、支柱断裂和滤器移位的发生率似乎低到可以接受程度,而且即使在长时间留置后,这些滤器仍相对易于取出。