Marn Nina, Klanjscek Tin, Stokes Lesley, Jusup Marko
Division for Marine and Environmental Research, Rudjer Boskovic Institute, Zagreb, Croatia.
Southeast Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 2;10(12):e0143747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143747. eCollection 2015.
Sea turtles face threats globally and are protected by national and international laws. Allometry and scaling models greatly aid sea turtle conservation and research, and help to better understand the biology of sea turtles. Scaling, however, may differ between regions and/or life stages. We analyze differences between (i) two different regional subsets and (ii) three different life stage subsets of the western North Atlantic loggerhead turtles by comparing the relative growth of body width and depth in relation to body length, and discuss the implications.
Results suggest that the differences between scaling relationships of different regional subsets are negligible, and models fitted on data from one region of the western North Atlantic can safely be used on data for the same life stage from another North Atlantic region. On the other hand, using models fitted on data for one life stage to describe other life stages is not recommended if accuracy is of paramount importance. In particular, young loggerhead turtles that have not recruited to neritic habitats should be studied and modeled separately whenever practical, while neritic juveniles and adults can be modeled together as one group. Even though morphometric scaling varies among life stages, a common model for all life stages can be used as a general description of scaling, and assuming isometric growth as a simplification is justified. In addition to linear models traditionally used for scaling on log-log axes, we test the performance of a saturating (curvilinear) model. The saturating model is statistically preferred in some cases, but the accuracy gained by the saturating model is marginal.
海龟在全球面临威胁,受到国家和国际法的保护。异速生长和比例模型极大地有助于海龟的保护和研究,并有助于更好地理解海龟的生物学特性。然而,比例关系可能因地区和/或生命阶段而异。我们通过比较北大西洋西部蠵龟身体宽度和深度相对于体长的相对生长情况,分析了(i)两个不同区域子集和(ii)三个不同生命阶段子集之间的差异,并讨论了其意义。
结果表明,不同区域子集的比例关系差异可忽略不计,基于北大西洋西部一个区域数据拟合的模型可安全地用于来自另一个北大西洋区域相同生命阶段的数据。另一方面,如果准确性至关重要,不建议使用基于一个生命阶段数据拟合的模型来描述其他生命阶段。特别是,未进入浅海栖息地的幼年蠵龟在实际可行时应单独进行研究和建模,而浅海幼年和成年蠵龟可作为一组进行建模。尽管形态测量比例在不同生命阶段有所不同,但可以使用一个适用于所有生命阶段的通用模型作为比例关系的一般描述,并且将等速生长作为一种简化假设是合理的。除了传统上用于对数-对数轴比例分析的线性模型外,我们还测试了一个饱和(曲线)模型的性能。在某些情况下,饱和模型在统计上更受青睐,但饱和模型获得的准确性是微不足道的。