Guerra Andres, Rangan Bavana V, Coleman Ameka, Xu Hao, Kotsia Anna, Christopoulos Georgios, Sosa Alan, Chao Howard, Han Henry, Abdurrahim Guthbudeen, Roesle Michele, de Lemos James A, McGuire Darren K, Packer Milton, Banerjee Subhash, Brilakis Emmanouil S
Dallas VA Medical Center (111A), 4500 South Lancaster Road, Dallas, TX 75216 USA.
J Invasive Cardiol. 2015 Dec;27(12):555-60.
Thirty-eight patients with intermediate (30%-60% diameter stenosis) saphenous vein graft lesions were randomized to extended-release niacin (ER-niacin) or placebo for 12 months. We sought to evaluate the impact of ER-niacin on carotid intima media thickness (CIMT), endothelial function, and endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) mobilization.
Carotid B-mode ultrasound was used to image the common and internal carotid arteries, at baseline and at 12 months after enrollment. Reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry, as assessed with EndoPAT 2000 (Itamar Medical, Inc) and EPC mobilization assessed with flow cytometry, were measured at enrollment, and at 1 and 12 months.
The baseline clinical characteristics were similar in the two study groups. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels tended to increase more in the ER-niacin group (5.9 ± 8.7 mg/dL vs 1.4 ± 7.1 mg/dL; P=.14). Between baseline and 12 months, right common carotid artery (0.96 ± 0.44 mm vs 0.70 ± 0.24 mm; P=.04), and left common carotid artery (0.80 ± 0.30 mm vs 0.70 ± 0.20 mm; P=.08) CIMT tended to decrease in the ER-niacin group, compared with no change in the placebo group. The change in logarithmic reactive hyperemia index between 1 month and 12 months was similar in patients receiving ER-niacin vs placebo (0.003 ± 0.12 vs -0.058 ± 0.12; P=.39), whereas EPC mobilization increased in the ER-niacin group and decreased in the placebo group (8.65 ± 28.41 vs -5.87 ± 30.23 EPC colony forming units/mL of peripheral blood; P=.02).
ER-niacin did not have a significant impact on CIMT or endothelial function, but increased EPC mobilization.
38例患有中度(直径狭窄30%-60%)大隐静脉移植血管病变的患者被随机分为缓释烟酸(ER-烟酸)组或安慰剂组,治疗12个月。我们试图评估ER-烟酸对颈动脉内膜中层厚度(CIMT)、内皮功能和内皮祖细胞(EPC)动员的影响。
在基线期和入组后12个月,使用颈动脉B型超声对颈总动脉和颈内动脉进行成像。在入组时、1个月和12个月时,使用EndoPAT 2000(Itamar Medical公司)评估反应性充血外周动脉张力测量法,并使用流式细胞术评估EPC动员情况。
两个研究组的基线临床特征相似。ER-烟酸组高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平升高幅度更大(5.9±8.7mg/dL对1.4±7.1mg/dL;P=0.14)。在基线期和12个月之间,ER-烟酸组右侧颈总动脉(0.96±0.44mm对0.70±0.24mm;P=0.04)和左侧颈总动脉(0.80±0.30mm对0.70±0.20mm;P=0.08)的CIMT有下降趋势,而安慰剂组无变化。接受ER-烟酸治疗的患者与接受安慰剂治疗的患者相比,1个月至12个月间对数反应性充血指数的变化相似(0.003±0.12对-0.058±0.12;P=0.39),而ER-烟酸组EPC动员增加,安慰剂组减少(外周血中EPC集落形成单位/mL为8.65±28.41对-5.87±30.23;P=0.02)。
ER-烟酸对CIMT或内皮功能没有显著影响,但增加了EPC动员。