Brown Matt J N, Staines W Richard
Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. W, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. W, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
Neuroimage. 2016 Feb 15;127:97-109. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.051. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) represent somatosensory processing in non-primary motor areas (i.e. frontal N30 and N60) and somatosensory cortices (i.e. parietal P50). It is well-known that the premotor cortex (PMC) and prefrontal cortex (PFC) are involved in the preparation and planning of upper limb movements but it is currently unclear how they modulate somatosensory processing for upper limb motor control. In the current study, two experiments examined SEP modulations after continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) was used to transiently disrupt the left PMC (Experiment 1) and right PFC (Experiment 2). Both Experiment 1 (n=15) and Experiment 2 (n=16) used pre-post experimental designs. In both experiments participants performed a task requiring detection of varying amplitudes of attended vibrotactile (VibT) stimuli to the left index finger (D2) and execution of a pre-matched finger sequence with the right (contralateral) hand to specific VibT targets. During the task, SEPs were measured to median nerve (MN) stimulations time-locked during pre-stimulus (250 ms before VibT), early response selection (250 ms after VibT), late preparatory (750 ms after VibT) and execution (1250 ms VibT) phases. The key findings of Experiment 1 revealed significant decreases in N30 and N60 peak amplitudes after cTBS to PMC. In contrast, the results of Experiment 2, also found significant decreased N60 peak amplitudes as well as trends for increased N30 and P50 peak amplitudes. A direct comparison of Experiment 1 and Experiment 2 confirmed differential modulation of N30 peak amplitudes after PMC (gated) compared to PFC (enhanced) cTBS. Collectively, these results support that both the left PMC and right PFC have modulatory roles on early somatosensory input into non-primary motor areas, such as PMC and supplementary motor area (SMA), represented by frontal N30 and N60 SEPs. These results confirm that PMC and PFC are both part of a network that regulates somatosensory input for upper limb motor control.
体感诱发电位(SEPs)代表非初级运动区域(即额叶N30和N60)和体感皮层(即顶叶P50)中的体感处理。众所周知,运动前皮层(PMC)和前额叶皮层(PFC)参与上肢运动的准备和规划,但目前尚不清楚它们如何调节用于上肢运动控制的体感处理。在当前的研究中,两项实验研究了在使用连续θ爆发刺激(cTBS)短暂破坏左侧PMC(实验1)和右侧PFC(实验2)后SEP的调制情况。实验1(n = 15)和实验2(n = 16)均采用前后实验设计。在两个实验中,参与者执行一项任务,即检测左手食指(D2)上不同振幅的触觉(VibT)刺激,并使用右手(对侧)执行与特定VibT目标预匹配的手指序列。在任务期间,测量在刺激前(VibT前250毫秒)、早期反应选择(VibT后250毫秒)、晚期准备(VibT后750毫秒)和执行(VibT后1250毫秒)阶段与正中神经(MN)刺激时间锁定的SEPs。实验1的主要发现显示,对PMC进行cTBS后,N30和N60峰值振幅显著降低。相比之下,实验2的结果还发现N60峰值振幅显著降低,以及N30和P50峰值振幅增加的趋势。对实验1和实验2的直接比较证实,与PFC(增强)cTBS相比,PMC(门控)cTBS后N30峰值振幅的差异调制。总体而言,这些结果支持左侧PMC和右侧PFC对进入非初级运动区域(如PMC和辅助运动区(SMA))的早期体感输入均具有调节作用,这些区域由额叶N30和N60 SEPs表示。这些结果证实,PMC和PFC都是调节上肢运动控制体感输入的网络的一部分。