Sankar Pamela L, Cho Mildred K
a University of Pennsylvania.
b Stanford University.
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(12):18-24. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1104169.
Recent experiments have been used to "edit" genomes of various plant, animal and other species, including humans, with unprecedented precision. Furthermore, editing the Cas9 endonuclease gene with a gene encoding the desired guide RNA into an organism, adjacent to an altered gene, could create a "gene drive" that could spread a trait through an entire population of organisms. These experiments represent advances along a spectrum of technological abilities that genetic engineers have been working on since the advent of recombinant DNA techniques. The scientific and bioethics communities have built substantial literatures about the ethical and policy implications of genetic engineering, especially in the age of bioterrorism. However, recent CRISPr/Cas experiments have triggered a rehashing of previous policy discussions, suggesting that the scientific community requires guidance on how to think about social responsibility. We propose a framework to enable analysis of social responsibility, using two examples of genetic engineering experiments.
最近的实验已被用于以前所未有的精度“编辑”各种植物、动物和其他物种(包括人类)的基因组。此外,将编码所需引导RNA的基因与经过编辑的基因相邻,导入生物体中编辑Cas9核酸内切酶基因,可能会产生一种“基因驱动”,这种“基因驱动”能够使一种性状在整个生物种群中传播。自重组DNA技术问世以来,这些实验代表了基因工程师一直在研究的一系列技术能力的进步。科学和生物伦理学界已经就基因工程的伦理和政策影响,尤其是在生物恐怖主义时代,撰写了大量文献。然而,最近的CRISPr/Cas实验引发了对先前政策讨论的重新审视,这表明科学界需要关于如何思考社会责任的指导。我们提出了一个框架,通过两个基因工程实验的例子,来进行社会责任分析。