Escott-Price Valentina, Kirov George, Rees Elliott, Isles Anthony R, Owen Michael J, O'Donovan Michael C
MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics & Genomics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 3;10(12):e0144172. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144172. eCollection 2015.
Most genetic studies assume that the function of a genetic variant is independent of the parent from which it is inherited, but this is not always true. The best known example of parent-of-origin effects arises with respect to alleles at imprinted loci. In classical imprinting, characteristically, either the maternal or paternal copy is expressed, but not both. Only alleles present in one of the parental copies of the gene, the expressed copy, is likely to contribute to disease. It has been postulated that imprinting is important in central nervous system development, and that consequently, imprinted loci may be involved in schizophrenia. If this is true, allowing for parent-of-origin effects might be important in genetic studies of schizophrenia. Here, we use genome-wide association data from one of the world's largest samples (N = 695) of parent schizophrenia-offspring trios to test for parent-of-origin effects. To maximise power, we restricted our analyses to test two main hypotheses. If imprinting plays a disproportionate role in schizophrenia susceptibility, we postulated a) that alleles showing robust evidence for association to schizophrenia from previous genome-wide association studies should be enriched for parent-of-origin effects and b) that genes at loci imprinted in humans or mice should be enriched both for genome-wide significant associations, and in our sample, for parent-of-origin effects. Neither prediction was supported in the present study. We have shown, that it is unlikely that parent-of-origin effects or imprinting play particularly important roles in schizophrenia, although our findings do not exclude such effects at specific loci nor do they exclude such effects among rare alleles.
大多数基因研究假定基因变异的功能与其遗传的亲本无关,但情况并非总是如此。最著名的亲本效应例子出现在印记基因座的等位基因方面。在经典印记中,通常要么母本拷贝表达,要么父本拷贝表达,但不会两者都表达。只有存在于基因的一个亲本拷贝(即表达拷贝)中的等位基因才可能导致疾病。据推测,印记在中枢神经系统发育中很重要,因此,印记基因座可能与精神分裂症有关。如果真是这样,在精神分裂症的基因研究中考虑亲本效应可能很重要。在此,我们使用来自世界上最大的亲本精神分裂症 - 后代三联体样本之一(N = 695)的全基因组关联数据来检验亲本效应。为了最大化检验效能,我们将分析限制在检验两个主要假设上。如果印记在精神分裂症易感性中起不成比例的作用,我们推测:a)从先前的全基因组关联研究中显示出与精神分裂症有强有力关联证据的等位基因应富集亲本效应;b)在人类或小鼠中印记的基因座上的基因应既富集全基因组显著关联,在我们的样本中也富集亲本效应。本研究中这两个预测均未得到支持。我们已经表明,亲本效应或印记在精神分裂症中不太可能起特别重要的作用,尽管我们的研究结果并不排除在特定基因座上存在此类效应,也不排除在罕见等位基因中存在此类效应。