Palatinus Lukáš, Corrêa Cinthia Antunes, Steciuk Gwladys, Jacob Damien, Roussel Pascal, Boullay Philippe, Klementová Mariana, Gemmi Mauro, Kopeček Jaromír, Domeneghetti M Chiara, Cámara Fernando, Petříček Václav
Institute of Physics of the AS CR, Na Slovance 2, Prague, Czech Republic.
Laboratoire CRISMAT, UMR CNRS 6508, ENSICAEN, 6 Bd Maréchal Juin, F-14050 Caen CEDEX 4, France.
Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater. 2015 Dec 1;71(Pt 6):740-51. doi: 10.1107/S2052520615017023. Epub 2015 Nov 7.
The recently published method for the structure refinement from three-dimensional precession electron diffraction data using dynamical diffraction theory [Palatinus et al. (2015). Acta Cryst. A71, 235-244] has been applied to a set of experimental data sets from five different samples - Ni2Si, PrVO3, kaolinite, orthopyroxene and mayenite. The data were measured on different instruments and with variable precession angles. For each sample a reliable reference structure was available. A large series of tests revealed that the method provides structure models with an average error in atomic positions typically between 0.01 and 0.02 Å. The obtained structure models are significantly more accurate than models obtained by refinement using kinematical approximation for the calculation of model intensities. The method also allows a reliable determination of site occupancies and determination of absolute structure. Based on the extensive tests, an optimal set of the parameters for the method is proposed.
最近发表的利用动力学衍射理论从三维进动电子衍射数据进行结构精修的方法[帕拉蒂努斯等人(2015年)。《晶体学报》A71卷,235 - 244页]已应用于来自五个不同样品——Ni2Si、PrVO3、高岭石、斜方辉石和钙钛矿的一组实验数据集。这些数据是在不同仪器上以可变进动角测量得到的。对于每个样品,都有一个可靠的参考结构。大量测试表明,该方法提供的结构模型在原子位置上的平均误差通常在0.01至0.02埃之间。所获得的结构模型比使用运动学近似计算模型强度进行精修得到的模型要精确得多。该方法还能可靠地确定位点占有率并确定绝对结构。基于广泛的测试,提出了该方法的一组最佳参数。