Faizullin I, Faizullina E
University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Institute of Sport Science and Sport, International Master "Physical Activity and Health", Erlangen, Germany.
Kazan State Medical University, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and STD, Kazan, Russia.
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S99-S101. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150707.
Ankle sprain is a medical condition when ankle ligaments are totally or partially torn. The primary cause of ankle sprain is sharp movements like turning or rolling the foot [1]. The ankle sprain needs to be treated right after the trauma, because if not treated it could lead to decreased stability of the ankle joint and lead to chronic ankle instability, which is characterized by increased risk of the ankle sprain [2] . We suppose that rehabilitation after the ankle sprain could significantly increase the performance of sportsmen.
To investigate effects of balance exercise training on instable ankle due to the previous ankle sprain injury. In addition, the secondary aim of this systematic review was to find the effectiveness of different balance training exercises on instable ankle in order to find better opportunities for rehabilitation of sportsmen.
The studies were selected from PubMed and Scopus using the library of the Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (further-UB FAU), we used full texts, and only texts in English were included in this review. The literature search was conducted at the end of December 2014. Texts included randomised controlled trials, which were published in the last 5 years (2009-2014). The literature was included in this review only if it was published in English and if the randomised controlled trial was conducted in the study and if the full text was available from UB FAU. The articles, which were found only in PubMed search, were excluded during Scopus search.PubMed search.First MeSH term was "Balance training for the ankle sprain" and 44 articles were found in PubMed. Then 29 articles were filtered by title and excluded from the study. Remaining 15 articles were assessed reading their abstracts, 6 of them were excluded and only 4 articles were left. The second MeSH term was "Balance training for ankle injury". Four additional articles were found by initial search. Two of them were filtered by the title and 2 were excluded at the stage of reading abstracts. The third MeSH term was "Balance exercises for instable ankle". One additional article was found by initial search and was excluded after reading the abstract.Scopus search.The same MeSH terms were used as in PubMed search. With the first MeSH term one article was found and filtered by the title. With the second MeSH term no results were found in the initial search and with the third term 2 articles were picked up by the initial search. One of these articles was filtered by the title. The other one was filtered after reading the abstract. Overall 8 articles were taken into consideration for conducting a systematic review. Nevertheless, three of them could not be downloaded for free even using UB FAU up to the 28th of December, 2014. Thus, five articles were taken for the systematic review. After reading all 5 articles, one article by Maraike Alice Wortmann and Carrie L. Docherty was excluded from the study because it was a systematic review per se and at the same time it was not mentioned neither in the article title, nor in the abstract that the current study was a systematic review [3]. Also the article by Borreani et al. 2014 [4] was excluded after reading the paragraph "Methods" as this was not an RCT but a descriptive study. Therefore, 3 articles were taken for conducting a systematic review.
The first article by Janssen et al. 2011 [5] was a 3-way randomised controlled trial with 1 year follow-up. Participants aged from 12 to 70 years used this intervention. People with active participation in sports with a lateral ankle sprain during the last 2 months were eligible for inclusion in the study. Participants were divided into 3 groups. Group 1 undertook an 8 week neuromuscular training programme. Group 2 wore sports brace during their sport activities for the duration of 1 year, and group 3 was a control group and used the combination of neuromuscular training program and wore sports brace for 8 weeks. There were 122 participants in the neuromuscular training group, 126 in the brace group and 136 in combined group. The drawback of this intervention was that there was no control over the care provid.In the second study by Ben Moussa Zouita, A et al. 2013 [6] the objective was to investigate how the proprioceptive exercises effect the postural balance and isokinetic strength in athletes with ankle sprain. 16 participants were recruited in the study and divided into two groups. The experimental group consisted of 8 participants with unilateral ankle sprain symptoms. The control group included another 8 participants with bilateral non-injured ankles. The training programme included 24 sessions during 8 weeks, every session lasted between 20 and 30 minutes. Four prescribed exercises were used during the intervention: one exercise without any material, one exercise with a ball only, one exercise with a balance board only and one exercise with a ball and a balance board. As a result, after 8 weeks of proprioceptive rehabilitation a significant improvement in extensor and flexor strength of ankle at a speed of 60-deg/sec was registered.The third study by Emery, Meeuwisse 2010 [7] was aimed to examine the effectiveness of the neuromuscular prevention strategy in youth soccer players. The inclusion criteria were adolescents between 13 and 18 years of age. The exclusion criteria were injury within 6 weeks and the history of systemic disease in anamnesis (i.e. cerebral palsy, head injury). 82 soccer teams were invited to take part in the intervention. 12 trainers declined the invitation, other 10 teams declined participation. Overall 60 teams took part in the intervention programme. The teams were randomised by a club. 32 training group teams (n = 380 players) and 28 control group players (n = 364 players) took part in the intervention. The training programme included dynamic stretching exercises, agility, jumping and balance and eccentric strength. The control programme was a standardized warm-up including static, dynamic and aerobic components and home-based stretching programme using 16-inch diameter wobble board used for 15 minutes during exercises. The injury rate in the training group was 2.08 injuries/1000 player-hours, and in the control group 3.35 injuries/1000 player-hours. The neuromuscular training programme was protective in injuries of youth soccer players.
Balance training is an effective training method for rehabilitation of instable ankle. Different approaches to balance training provide in general similar improvement for sprained ankle.Implications for future studies:More RCTs on chronic ankle instability are needed with large sample size and use of different intensities of exercises. It would be better for the UB FAU to provide access to articles so that students and researches could download articles for free from different electronic sources.
踝关节扭伤是指踝关节韧带全部或部分撕裂的一种病症。踝关节扭伤的主要原因是诸如足部扭转或翻滚等剧烈动作[1]。踝关节扭伤后需立即进行治疗,因为若不治疗,可能会导致踝关节稳定性下降,进而引发慢性踝关节不稳,其特征是踝关节扭伤风险增加[2]。我们推测,踝关节扭伤后的康复训练可显著提高运动员的表现。
探讨平衡训练对既往踝关节扭伤所致不稳定踝关节的影响。此外,本系统评价的次要目的是找出不同平衡训练练习对不稳定踝关节的有效性,以便为运动员找到更好的康复机会。
使用埃尔朗根 - 纽伦堡弗里德里希 - 亚历山大大学图书馆(埃尔朗根 - 纽伦堡大学图书馆,简称UB FAU)从PubMed和Scopus中筛选研究,我们使用全文,本评价仅纳入英文文本。文献检索于2014年12月底进行。纳入的文本包括过去5年(2009 - 2014年)发表的随机对照试验。仅当文献以英文发表、在研究中进行了随机对照试验且可从UB FAU获取全文时,才纳入本评价。在Scopus检索过程中,排除仅在PubMed检索中找到的文章。PubMed检索。第一个医学主题词是“踝关节扭伤的平衡训练”,在PubMed中找到44篇文章。然后通过标题筛选出29篇文章并排除在研究之外。阅读剩余15篇文章的摘要后,排除其中6篇,仅剩下4篇文章。第二个医学主题词是“踝关节损伤的平衡训练”。初步检索又找到4篇文章。其中2篇通过标题筛选,2篇在阅读摘要阶段被排除。第三个医学主题词是“不稳定踝关节的平衡练习”。初步检索找到1篇文章,阅读摘要后将其排除。Scopus检索。使用与PubMed检索相同的医学主题词。第一个医学主题词找到1篇文章并通过标题筛选。第二个医学主题词在初步检索中未找到结果,第三个主题词初步检索找到2篇文章。其中1篇通过标题筛选,另一篇在阅读摘要后被筛选掉。总体而言,8篇文章被纳入进行系统评价。然而,截至2014年12月28日,即使使用UB FAU,其中3篇文章也无法免费下载。因此,5篇文章被纳入系统评价。阅读所有5篇文章后,Maraike Alice Wortmann和Carrie L. Docherty的一篇文章被排除在研究之外,因为它本身就是一篇系统评价,且在文章标题和摘要中均未提及当前研究是系统评价[3]。阅读“方法”段落后,Borreani等人2014年的文章[4]也被排除,因为这不是一项随机对照试验,而是一项描述性研究。因此,3篇文章被纳入进行系统评价。
Janssen等人2011年的第一篇文章[5]是一项为期1年随访的三向随机对照试验。年龄在12至70岁之间的参与者使用了这种干预措施。在过去2个月内有外侧踝关节扭伤且积极参与运动的人有资格纳入该研究。参与者分为3组。第1组进行为期8周的神经肌肉训练计划。第2组在其运动活动期间佩戴运动护具,为期1年,第3组为对照组,使用神经肌肉训练计划并佩戴运动护具8周。神经肌肉训练组有122名参与者,护具组有126名参与者,联合组有136名参与者。这种干预措施的缺点是对所提供的护理没有控制。在Ben Moussa Zouita等人于2013年进行的第二项研究[6]中,目的是研究本体感觉练习如何影响踝关节扭伤运动员的姿势平衡和等速肌力。该研究招募了16名参与者并将其分为两组。实验组由8名有单侧踝关节扭伤症状的参与者组成。对照组包括另外8名双侧未受伤踝关节的参与者。训练计划包括在8周内进行24次训练,每次训练持续20至30分钟。干预期间使用了4种规定练习:一种不使用任何器材的练习,一种仅使用球的练习,一种仅使用平衡板的练习,以及一种使用球和平衡板的练习。结果,经过8周的本体感觉康复训练后,踝关节以60度/秒速度的伸肌和屈肌力量有显著改善。Emery、Meeuwisse于2010年进行的第三项研究[7]旨在检验神经肌肉预防策略在青少年足球运动员中的有效性。纳入标准为13至18岁的青少年。排除标准为6周内受伤以及病史中有全身性疾病(如脑瘫、头部受伤)。邀请了82支足球队参与干预。12名教练拒绝了邀请,另外10支球队拒绝参与。总体而言,60支球队参与了干预计划。这些球队按俱乐部进行随机分组。32个训练组球队(n = 380名球员)和28个对照组(n = 364名球员)参与了干预。训练计划包括动态拉伸练习、敏捷性、跳跃和平衡以及离心力量训练。对照计划是一个标准化的热身,包括静态、动态和有氧成分以及在家中使用16英寸直径的摇摆板进行15分钟的拉伸练习。训练组的损伤率为2.08次损伤/1000球员小时,对照组为3.35次损伤/1000球员小时。神经肌肉训练计划对青少年足球运动员的损伤有预防作用。
平衡训练是不稳定踝关节康复的有效训练方法。不同的平衡训练方法总体上对扭伤的踝关节提供了相似的改善效果。对未来研究的启示:需要更多关于慢性踝关节不稳的随机对照试验,样本量要大,并使用不同强度的练习。埃尔朗根 - 纽伦堡大学图书馆最好能提供文章访问权限,以便学生和研究人员能够从不同电子资源免费下载文章。